IGP: horrible call!

Well, in the end, there would have been a sac fly and Barmes would
have scored anyway, so maybe it would not have been a big deal... but
I am angry.

On Apr 29, 10:12*pm, Jesse Radin <electricbass...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, in the end, there would have been a sac fly and Barmes would
> have scored anyway, so maybe it would not have been a big deal... but
> I am angry.

I disagree, as Lincecum would pitch differently with the man still on
3rd base. 3 innings left, can't let it get them down. Winn out at
3rd, ouch.....

On Apr 29, 10:17*pm, giantforever <t_marov...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 10:12*pm, Jesse Radin <electricbass...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, in the end, there would have been a sac fly and Barmes would
> > have scored anyway, so maybe it would not have been a big deal... but
> > I am angry.
>
> I disagree, as Lincecum would pitch differently with the man still on
> 3rd base. *3 innings left, can't let it get them down. *Winn out at
> 3rd, ouch.....

and Velez picked off of 1st, not a good inning boys...

"giantforever" <t_marovich@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:90fc010a-b8c3-47d2-8135-47ed2a75e315@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 29, 10:17 pm, giantforever <t_marov...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 10:12 pm, Jesse Radin <electricbass...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, in the end, there would have been a sac fly and Barmes would
> > have scored anyway, so maybe it would not have been a big deal... but
> > I am angry.
>
> I disagree, as Lincecum would pitch

That was a fairly shallow fly, not sure that the run would have scored.

On Apr 29, 10:32*pm, "Dr. Wayne Simon" <wayne.si...@comcast.net>
wrote:
> "giantforever" <t_marov...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:90fc010a-b8c3-47d2-8135-47ed2a75e315@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 29, 10:17 pm, giantforever <t_marov...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 29, 10:12 pm, Jesse Radin <electricbass...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Well, in the end, there would have been a sac fly and Barmes would
> > > have scored anyway, so maybe it would not have been a big deal... but
> > > I am angry.
>
> > I disagree, as Lincecum would pitch
>
> That was a fairly shallow fly, *not sure that the run would have scored.

Bottom of the ninth.....time for some SMART baserunning!!!

On Apr 29, 10:56*pm, giantforever <t_marov...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 10:32*pm, "Dr. Wayne Simon" <wayne.si...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> > "giantforever" <t_marov...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:90fc010a-b8c3-47d2-8135-47ed2a75e315@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> > On Apr 29, 10:17 pm, giantforever <t_marov...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 29, 10:12 pm, Jesse Radin <electricbass...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Well, in the end, there would have been a sac fly and Barmes would
> > > > have scored anyway, so maybe it would not have been a big deal... but
> > > > I am angry.
>
> > > I disagree, as Lincecum would pitch
>
> > That was a fairly shallow fly, *not sure that the run would have scored.
>
> Bottom of the ninth.....time for some SMART baserunning!!!

Tough loss, many blown opps tonight.

Hmm... bottom 9th, tying run on 2B, Lewis who is batting .330 this season
and 2 for 4 in the game, and also batting .400 versus lefties, was replaced
by Ortmeier who's hitting .250, but had one good game last night. Good or
bad move?

On Apr 29, 11:16*pm, "Awesome Lincecum" <Lince...@sf.giants> wrote:
> Hmm... bottom 9th, tying run on 2B, Lewis who is batting .330 this season
> and 2 for 4 in the game, and also batting .400 versus lefties, was replaced
> by Ortmeier who's hitting .250, but had one good game last night. *Good or
> bad move?

I though it was odd with Lewis being hot, but with Fuentes' throwing
motion, lefty/righty would seem to be the right move. Bochy hasn't
used Lewis vs. lefties all season, only 5 AB.