tell me how he didn't blow this game

"Pouta" <aquarius_122@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:84069c2b-fd55-413b-928b-123649088194@j68g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> tell me how he didn't blow this game

Who didn't? Scifres was the only reason this game was close.
6 punts
Avg 55.8
Net avg 50.5

Do they keep records for shit like that?

ScottW

"ScottW" <ScottW48@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gj9Gk.17665$kn5.2959@newsfe12.iad...
>
> "Pouta" <aquarius_122@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:84069c2b-fd55-413b-928b-123649088194@j68g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> tell me how he didn't blow this game
>
> Who didn't? Scifres was the only reason this game was close.
> 6 punts
> Avg 55.8
> Net avg 50.5
>
> Do they keep records for shit like that?
>
> ScottW
>
>

Jammer had his first bad game in a couple of years Give the guy a break.

Getting beat twice in a row at one point by Camirillo is kind of pathetic,
thoough.

--Robin

> Jammer had his first bad game in a couple of years Give the guy a break.
>
> Getting beat twice in a row at one point by Camirillo is kind of pathetic,
> thoough.

It's pretty simple. The game is on the line, the clock is running, we need
to get the ball back or we're going to lose. Somebody step up and make a
fucking play. Anybody.

> > "Pouta" <aquarius_122@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:84069c2b-fd55-413b-928b-123649088194@j68g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> tell me how he didn't blow this game
> >
>
> > Who didn't? Scifres was the only reason this game was close.
> > 6 punts
> > Avg 55.8
> > Net avg 50.5
> >
> > Do they keep records for shit like that?
> >
> > ScottW
> >
>
> Jammer had his first bad game in a couple of years Give the guy a break.
>
> Getting beat twice in a row at one point by Camirillo is kind of pathetic,
> thoough.
>
> --Robin

With all due respect Jammer has 11 picks in 7 years despite being a
starter basically from the beginning. To say Jammer is not exactly a
ballhawk is like saying Jamal Williams is not exactly a vegetarian. He
just doesn't seem to ever make a play on the ball. The receiver catches
it, Jammer makes the tackle.

Is he a bad corner? No. But he's not really much of a playmaker over
there. He's the perfect corner for Cottrell's 32nd ranked pass defense.
And that's not much of a compliment.

-Coach-
http://www.coachschorr.com

"Ben M. Schorr" <bogusaddy@factplace.com> wrote in message
news:gcboq1$bkc$1@aioe.org...
>> > "Pouta" <aquarius_122@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:84069c2b-fd55-413b-928b-123649088194@j68g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> tell me how he didn't blow this game
>> >
>>
>> > Who didn't? Scifres was the only reason this game was close.
>> > 6 punts
>> > Avg 55.8
>> > Net avg 50.5
>> >
>> > Do they keep records for shit like that?
>> >
>> > ScottW
>> >
>>
>> Jammer had his first bad game in a couple of years Give the guy a break.
>>
>> Getting beat twice in a row at one point by Camirillo is kind of
>> pathetic,
>> thoough.
>>
>> --Robin
>
> With all due respect Jammer has 11 picks in 7 years despite being a
> starter basically from the beginning. To say Jammer is not exactly a
> ballhawk is like saying Jamal Williams is not exactly a vegetarian. He
> just doesn't seem to ever make a play on the ball. The receiver catches
> it, Jammer makes the tackle.
>
> Is he a bad corner? No. But he's not really much of a playmaker over
> there. He's the perfect corner for Cottrell's 32nd ranked pass defense.
> And that's not much of a compliment.

At least he'll come up and fill on running plays, I see Cromartie dancing
around the scrum like it's a cold swimming pool he's afraid to dip his toe
into. I don't think he's our weak link.

"badlands420" <bung@hole.com> wrote in message
news:Wn9Gk.6588$Bt4.3337@newsfe08.iad:

> > Jammer had his first bad game in a couple of years Give the guy a break.
> >
> > Getting beat twice in a row at one point by Camirillo is kind of pathetic,
> > thoough.
>
>
> It's pretty simple. The game is on the line, the clock is running, we need
> to get the ball back or we're going to lose. Somebody step up and make a
> fucking play. Anybody.

It's Cottrell's job to put them in a position to do that. But lining up
your DBs 7 yards off the ball on 2nd and 6 and rushing 4 is not the way
you do that.

-Coach-
http://www.coachschorr.com

> > With all due respect Jammer has 11 picks in 7 years despite being a
> > starter basically from the beginning. To say Jammer is not exactly a
> > ballhawk is like saying Jamal Williams is not exactly a vegetarian. He
> > just doesn't seem to ever make a play on the ball. The receiver catches
> > it, Jammer makes the tackle.
> >
> > Is he a bad corner? No. But he's not really much of a playmaker over
> > there. He's the perfect corner for Cottrell's 32nd ranked pass defense.
> > And that's not much of a compliment.
>
> At least he'll come up and fill on running plays,

Yes, Jammer is a good tackler who isn't afraid to put pads on people.
Good thing too, considering how many people catch the football around
him.
:-)

> I see Cromartie dancing
> around the scrum like it's a cold swimming pool he's afraid to dip his toe
> into.

I dunno, I saw Cromartie lay some pretty good hits on people today. I
don't think you want Cromartie diving into piles unless it's necessary
anyhow. Last thing we need is for him to get injured piling on a play
he didn't need to be on. He seems to be the one guy in our secondary
capable of making a big play.

> I don't think he's our weak link.

Cottrell is our weak link.

-Coach-
http://www.coachschorr.com

On Oct 5, 6:14 pm, "Ben M. Schorr" <bogusa...@factplace.com> wrote:

>
> With all due respect Jammer has 11 picks in 7 years despite being a
> starter basically from the beginning.  To say Jammer is not exactly a
> ballhawk is like saying Jamal Williams is not exactly a vegetarian.  He
> just doesn't seem to ever make a play on the ball.  




lol!

Well, at least he's improved a little bit. I've seen him actually turn
around and try to look at the ball a few times this year.

Clinton Hart pulled a "Jammer" on that PI in the 4th quarter when
Miami was throwing from it's own end zone. Hart turned around, didn't
see the ball because he was looking at the wrong trajectory, and
pulled the receiver down for fear of the receiver catching it and
beating him for a TD. Ironically, he was in perfect position to make a
play on the ball. It was thrown too high and Hart was deeper than the
receiver.

> Getting beat twice in a row at one point by
> Camirillo is kind of pathetic, though.
>

you can say that again !

is Camarillo going to turn out to be another
Wes Welker that the Chargers let go ?!?!?!

<myancov@gmail.com> wrote
>> Getting beat twice in a row at one point by
>> Camirillo is kind of pathetic, though.
>>
>
> you can say that again !
>
> is Camarillo going to turn out to be another
> Wes Welker that the Chargers let go ?!?!?!

I certainly didn't see anything wrong with his hands _or_ speed yesterday.
Very quick.

> is Camarillo going to turn out to be another
> Wes Welker that the Chargers let go ?!?!?!

it was more important to keep Buster Davis & Malcolm Floyd...

> it was more important to keep Buster Davis & Malcolm Floyd...

Does anyone honestly think our issues on offense have anything to do with
not keeping Wes Welker or Greg Camarillo? Seriously Pouta, even with as
spectacularly wrong as you are about almost everything, you can't be *that*
delusional.

"badlands420" <bung@hole.com> wrote in message
news:fizGk.2697$t76.2100@newsfe06.iad...
>
>> it was more important to keep Buster Davis & Malcolm Floyd...
>
> Does anyone honestly think our issues on offense have anything to do with
> not keeping Wes Welker or Greg Camarillo? Seriously Pouta, even with as
> spectacularly wrong as you are about almost everything, you can't be
> *that* delusional.

Not at all, that's not the point. It's that Camarillo looks good, being beat
by him doesn't carry a stigma. Actually, sort of a backhand compliment to
Jammer.