PING: Jeffy Asslips... Another Great Honor

John Aldrich

10-05-2008, 10:24 PM

On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:46:34 -0700 (PDT), Tom <drsoong@aol.com> wrote:

>Watching the Cubs be the Cubs....
>
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
>Beaten by the worst team in the playoffs... PRICELESS!
>
>Tom

When someone stopped by the group a week or two ago and said something
to the effect of how Cardinals fans should have fun and be honored
watching the best team in baseball (Cubs) be in the playoffs while we
jealously sat around pissing and moaning, it was difficult to take.

I never thought I'd say this ... but he was right. I DID have a lot
of fun watching the Cubs in the playoffs. :)

John

Reverend Ozone

10-05-2008, 11:04 PM

And lo, did *Tom* scribe these words:

> Watching the Cubs be the Cubs....
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
> Beaten by the worst team in the playoffs... PRICELESS!
>
> Tom

Well, /that/ was mature.....

....and, oh, we do *not* claim BumLips as our own, so guess you're a twit, too.

--
Reverend Ozone

"Homo Sapiens non urinat in ventum."

Tom

10-06-2008, 12:10 AM

On Oct 5, 5:04 pm, "Reverend Ozone"
<CaptainOzon...@netzero.teeheeyukyuk.com> wrote:
> And lo, did *Tom* scribe these words:
>
> > Watching the Cubs be the Cubs....
>
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
> > Beaten by the worst team in the playoffs... PRICELESS!
>
> > Tom
>
> Well, /that/ was mature.....
>
> ...and, oh, we do *not* claim BumLips as our own, so guess you're a twit,too.
>
> --
> Reverend Ozone
>
> "Homo Sapiens non urinat in ventum."

If you'll take a gander at the header, it says "PING: Jeffy
Asslips..." This directed specifically at him. I made no mention of
any other Cubs fans or Cubs fan in general.

Based on your reading comprehension, I guess you're a twit, too.

Tom

Reverend Ozone

10-06-2008, 04:23 AM

And lo, did *Tom* scribe these words:

Go plonk thyself.

--
Reverend Ozone

"Homo Sapiens non urinat in ventum."

10-06-2008, 03:16 PM

x-no-archive: yes

"John Aldrich" <johnaldrich@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:d0cie4hui9dahkgphu4m9auo0crb5fu1uc@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:46:34 -0700 (PDT), Tom <drsoong@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>Watching the Cubs be the Cubs....
>>
>>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>Beaten by the worst team in the playoffs... PRICELESS!
>>
>>Tom
>
> When someone stopped by the group a week or two ago and said something
> to the effect of how Cardinals fans should have fun and be honored
> watching the best team in baseball (Cubs) be in the playoffs while we
> jealously sat around pissing and moaning, it was difficult to take.
>
> I never thought I'd say this ... but he was right. I DID have a lot
> of fun watching the Cubs in the playoffs. :)

Me, too!
Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time* on this
ng?
I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by now>

LTC A

10-06-2008, 04:26 PM

A wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "John Aldrich" <johnaldrich@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:d0cie4hui9dahkgphu4m9auo0crb5fu1uc@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:46:34 -0700 (PDT), Tom <drsoong@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Watching the Cubs be the Cubs....
>>>
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>>
>>> Beaten by the worst team in the playoffs... PRICELESS!
>>>
>>> Tom
>> When someone stopped by the group a week or two ago and said something
>> to the effect of how Cardinals fans should have fun and be honored
>> watching the best team in baseball (Cubs) be in the playoffs while we
>> jealously sat around pissing and moaning, it was difficult to take.
>>
>> I never thought I'd say this ... but he was right. I DID have a lot
>> of fun watching the Cubs in the playoffs. :)
>
> Me, too!
> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time* on this
> ng?
> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by now>
>

I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I didn't
see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
perspective on things from time to time.

Darrell

Eric Margheim

10-06-2008, 04:31 PM

>>>Beaten by the worst team in the playoffs... PRICELESS!
>>>
>>>Tom
>>
>> When someone stopped by the group a week or two ago and said something
>> to the effect of how Cardinals fans should have fun and be honored
>> watching the best team in baseball (Cubs) be in the playoffs while we
>> jealously sat around pissing and moaning, it was difficult to take.
>>
>> I never thought I'd say this ... but he was right. I DID have a lot
>> of fun watching the Cubs in the playoffs. :)
>
> Me, too!
> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time* on this
> ng?
> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by now>
>

What is wrong with you? You do realize that most of your fellow fans in
this NG don't even respect you. I feel honored that you care so much about
me to call me out. LOL. If I am your worst nightmare in this NG you have
problems, my friend.

The Cubs flat out choked. Not much else to say. Was it the pressure or
just the fact that they have an offense that is built for the regular season
and not post season? Hard to say. I think changes definitely need to be
made next year. The pitching should be solid and they still have a good
team and will likely be in contention to win the division again. Who's
going to challenge? We'll see. Brewers are going to drop off. Cardinals
have many question marks.

Go Bears and Go Mizzou. Way to go Illinis. I still have some good
football to look forward to. No crying here. Sorry to disappoint.

I will pop in a bit over the offseason just to annoy you! Lance and I will
toast to your ignorance around the fireplace when we go on our annual ski
trip to Aspen in January. ;-)

Eric Margheim

10-06-2008, 04:52 PM

>>
>> Me, too!
>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time* on
>> this ng?
>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by now>
>>
>
> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I didn't
> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
> perspective on things from time to time.
>
> Darrell

Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start classifying
guys like aslip.

When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in, it kind of makes you laugh when
he considers me a troll.

Tom

10-06-2008, 06:54 PM

On Oct 6, 9:16 am, "A" <a...@att.net> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "John Aldrich" <johnaldr...@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d0cie4hui9dahkgphu4m9auo0crb5fu1uc@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:46:34 -0700 (PDT), Tom <drso...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >>Watching the Cubs be the Cubs....
>
> >>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> >>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> >>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> >>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> >>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> >>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> >>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> >>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> >>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
> >>Beaten by the worst team in the playoffs... PRICELESS!
>
> >>Tom
>
> > When someone stopped by the group a week or two ago and said something
> > to the effect of how Cardinals fans should have fun and be honored
> > watching the best team in baseball (Cubs) be in the playoffs while we
> > jealously sat around pissing and moaning, it was difficult to take.
>
> > I never thought I'd say this ... but he was right. I DID have a lot
> > of fun watching the Cubs in the playoffs. :)
>
> Me, too!
> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time* on this
> ng?
> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by now>

Eric is a welcome poster here Roy, unlike you.

Tom

Eric Margheim

10-06-2008, 08:37 PM

>
> > When someone stopped by the group a week or two ago and said something
> > to the effect of how Cardinals fans should have fun and be honored
> > watching the best team in baseball (Cubs) be in the playoffs while we
> > jealously sat around pissing and moaning, it was difficult to take.
>
> > I never thought I'd say this ... but he was right. I DID have a lot
> > of fun watching the Cubs in the playoffs. :)
>
> Me, too!
> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time* on this
> ng?
> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by now>

>>Eric is a welcome poster here Roy, unlike you.

>> Tom

I can think of few things more harsh than one Cardinal fan telling another
Cardinal fan that he is less welcome in his "house" than a Cub fan! LOL.

10-06-2008, 10:14 PM

x-no-archive: yes

"Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>>>
>>> Me, too!
>>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time* on
>>> this ng?
>>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by now>
>>>
>>
>> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I didn't
>> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
>> perspective on things from time to time.
>>
>> Darrell
>
> Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
> classifying guys like aslip.
>
> When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,

ONE time.

> it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.

How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in the
Cardinals' ng?

Tom

10-06-2008, 10:20 PM

On Oct 6, 4:14 pm, "A" <a...@att.net> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargh...@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>
> news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> >>> Me, too!
> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time* on
> >>> this ng?
> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by now>
>
> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I didn't
> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
> >> perspective on things from time to time.
>
> >> Darrell
>
> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
> > classifying guys like aslip.
>
> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
>
> ONE time.
>
> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
>
> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in the
> Cardinals' ng?

I count three in this thread alone, you dumbfuck.

Tom

Jeanne Douglas

10-07-2008, 06:19 AM

In article <d6CdnXWkHp5P4nfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:

> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
> news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
> >>>
> >>> Me, too!
> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time* on
> >>> this ng?
> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by now>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I didn't
> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
> >> perspective on things from time to time.
> >>
> >> Darrell
> >
> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
> > classifying guys like aslip.
> >
> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
>
> ONE time.
>
> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
>
> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in the
> Cardinals' ng?

A kloo for you:

Mere posting in a newsgroup, even a rival team's newsgroup, does not
make one a troll. Trollish behavior makes one a troll.

HTH.

--
JD

"...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
'Serenity' is the cure."

WR69

10-07-2008, 08:17 PM

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd-712DBC.22192106102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> In article <d6CdnXWkHp5P4nfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
>
>> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>> >>>
>> >>> Me, too!
>> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time* on
>> >>> this ng?
>> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by
>> >>> now>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I
>> >> didn't
>> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
>> >> perspective on things from time to time.
>> >>
>> >> Darrell
>> >
>> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
>> > classifying guys like aslip.
>> >
>> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
>>
>> ONE time.
>>
>> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
>>
>> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in the
>> Cardinals' ng?
>
> A kloo for you:
>
> Mere posting in a newsgroup, even a rival team's newsgroup, does not
> make one a troll. Trollish behavior makes one a troll.

I'd love to hear your definition of troll'ish behavior Jean....having ones
own opinion and standing by it? Not backing down from attacks to one's
character when voicing those opinions? Enlighten.

10-07-2008, 09:53 PM

x-no-archive: yes

"WR69" <davewilson6969@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:qBOGk.3983$Ws1.3433@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:hlwdjsd-712DBC.22192106102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
>> In article <d6CdnXWkHp5P4nfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Me, too!
>>> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time*
>>> >>> on
>>> >>> this ng?
>>> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by
>>> >>> now>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I
>>> >> didn't
>>> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
>>> >> perspective on things from time to time.
>>> >>
>>> >> Darrell
>>> >
>>> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
>>> > classifying guys like aslip.
>>> >
>>> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
>>>
>>> ONE time.
>>>
>>> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
>>>
>>> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in the
>>> Cardinals' ng?
>>
>> A kloo for you:
>>
>> Mere posting in a newsgroup, even a rival team's newsgroup, does not
>> make one a troll. Trollish behavior makes one a troll.
>
>
> I'd love to hear your definition of troll'ish behavior Jean....

So would I. She fancies herself the Lord and defines what is
and what is not 'trolling'.
BTW, that's just a made-up word to bash somebody whose opinions
one dislikes.
Everybody has a right to post in *whatever* ng one wants to post
in and deliver his opinion.
If you disagree, so be it.
But you can't label and defame someone by despicable
name-calling as in 'troll'.
Does Jean get her words and lines from old nursery rhymes?

>having ones own opinion and standing by it? Not backing down from attacks
>to one's character when voicing those opinions? Enlighten.

She can't--since she would be defining something that is
undefined and completely made-up just to trash someone's opinion she (or
others) disagree with.

Tom

10-08-2008, 12:24 AM

On Oct 7, 3:53 pm, "A" <a...@att.net> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "WR69" <davewilson6...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>
> news:qBOGk.3983$Ws1.3433@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
> >news:hlwdjsd-712DBC.22192106102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> >> In article <d6CdnXWkHp5P4nfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdn...@earthlink.com>,
> >> "A" <a...@att.net> wrote:
>
> >>> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargh...@centurytel.net> wrote in message
> >>>news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>
> >>> >>> Me, too!
> >>> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time*
> >>> >>> on
> >>> >>> this ng?
> >>> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by
> >>> >>> now>
>
> >>> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I
> >>> >> didn't
> >>> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
> >>> >> perspective on things from time to time.
>
> >>> >> Darrell
>
> >>> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
> >>> > classifying guys like aslip.
>
> >>> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
>
> >>> ONE time.
>
> >>> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
>
> >>> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in the
> >>> Cardinals' ng?
>
> >> A kloo for you:
>
> >> Mere posting in a newsgroup, even a rival team's newsgroup, does not
> >> make one a troll. Trollish behavior makes one a troll.
>
> > I'd love to hear your definition of troll'ish behavior Jean....
>
> So would I. She fancies herself the Lord and defines what is
> and what is not 'trolling'.
> BTW, that's just a made-up word to bash somebody whose opinions
> one dislikes.
> Everybody has a right to post in *whatever* ng one wants to post
> in and deliver his opinion.
> If you disagree, so be it.
> But you can't label and defame someone by despicable
> name-calling as in 'troll'.
> Does Jean get her words and lines from old nursery rhymes?
>
> >having ones own opinion and standing by it? Not backing down from attacks
> >to one's character when voicing those opinions? Enlighten.
>
> She can't--since she would be defining something that is
> undefined and completely made-up just to trash someone's opinion she (or
> others) disagree with.

Crawl back under your bridge, Roy.

Tom

Eric Margheim

10-08-2008, 02:15 AM

"WR69" <davewilson6969@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:qBOGk.3983$Ws1.3433@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:hlwdjsd-712DBC.22192106102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
>> In article <d6CdnXWkHp5P4nfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Me, too!
>>> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time*
>>> >>> on
>>> >>> this ng?
>>> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by
>>> >>> now>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I
>>> >> didn't
>>> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
>>> >> perspective on things from time to time.
>>> >>
>>> >> Darrell
>>> >
>>> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
>>> > classifying guys like aslip.
>>> >
>>> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
>>>
>>> ONE time.
>>>
>>> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
>>>
>>> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in the
>>> Cardinals' ng?
>>
>> A kloo for you:
>>
>> Mere posting in a newsgroup, even a rival team's newsgroup, does not
>> make one a troll. Trollish behavior makes one a troll.
>
>
> I'd love to hear your definition of troll'ish behavior Jean....having ones
> own opinion and standing by it? Not backing down from attacks to one's
> character when voicing those opinions? Enlighten.
>

http://askville.amazon.com/SimilarQuestions.do?req=definition-internet-troll

Enjoy. See if you can find the one that fits you.

Jeanne Douglas

10-08-2008, 02:51 AM

In article <3badnSOB0YrSUXbVnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:

> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "WR69" <davewilson6969@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:qBOGk.3983$Ws1.3433@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
> >
> > "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
> > news:hlwdjsd-712DBC.22192106102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> >> In article <d6CdnXWkHp5P4nfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
> >> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
> >>> news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Me, too!
> >>> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time*
> >>> >>> on
> >>> >>> this ng?
> >>> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by
> >>> >>> now>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I
> >>> >> didn't
> >>> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
> >>> >> perspective on things from time to time.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Darrell
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
> >>> > classifying guys like aslip.
> >>> >
> >>> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
> >>>
> >>> ONE time.
> >>>
> >>> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
> >>>
> >>> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in the
> >>> Cardinals' ng?
> >>
> >> A kloo for you:
> >>
> >> Mere posting in a newsgroup, even a rival team's newsgroup, does not
> >> make one a troll. Trollish behavior makes one a troll.
> >
> >
> > I'd love to hear your definition of troll'ish behavior Jean....
>
> So would I. She fancies herself the Lord and defines what is
> and what is not 'trolling'.
> BTW, that's just a made-up word to bash somebody whose opinions
> one dislikes.
> Everybody has a right to post in *whatever* ng one wants to post
> in and deliver his opinion.
> If you disagree, so be it.
> But you can't label and defame someone by despicable
> name-calling as in 'troll'.
> Does Jean get her words and lines from old nursery rhymes?
>
> >having ones own opinion and standing by it? Not backing down from attacks
> >to one's character when voicing those opinions? Enlighten.
>
> She can't--since she would be defining something that is
> undefined and completely made-up just to trash someone's opinion she (or
> others) disagree with.

Who is this Jean you're talking about; this person's messages aren't
making it to my newsreader.

--
JD

"...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
'Serenity' is the cure."

10-08-2008, 07:11 AM

x-no-archive: yes

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd-996D6D.18513707102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> In article <3badnSOB0YrSUXbVnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
>
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> "WR69" <davewilson6969@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:qBOGk.3983$Ws1.3433@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
>> >
>> > "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
>> > news:hlwdjsd-712DBC.22192106102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
>> >> In article <d6CdnXWkHp5P4nfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>> >> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> >>> news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Me, too!
>> >>> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long
>> >>> >>> time*
>> >>> >>> on
>> >>> >>> this ng?
>> >>> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass
>> >>> >>> by
>> >>> >>> now>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I
>> >>> >> didn't
>> >>> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
>> >>> >> perspective on things from time to time.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Darrell
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
>> >>> > classifying guys like aslip.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
>> >>>
>> >>> ONE time.
>> >>>
>> >>> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
>> >>>
>> >>> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in
>> >>> the
>> >>> Cardinals' ng?
>> >>
>> >> A kloo for you:
>> >>
>> >> Mere posting in a newsgroup, even a rival team's newsgroup, does not
>> >> make one a troll. Trollish behavior makes one a troll.
>> >
>> >
>> > I'd love to hear your definition of troll'ish behavior Jean....
>>
>> So would I. She fancies herself the Lord and defines what is
>> and what is not 'trolling'.
>> BTW, that's just a made-up word to bash somebody whose
>> opinions
>> one dislikes.
>> Everybody has a right to post in *whatever* ng one wants to
>> post
>> in and deliver his opinion.
>> If you disagree, so be it.
>> But you can't label and defame someone by despicable
>> name-calling as in 'troll'.
>> Does Jean get her words and lines from old nursery rhymes?
>>
>> >having ones own opinion and standing by it? Not backing down from
>> >attacks
>> >to one's character when voicing those opinions? Enlighten.
>>
>> She can't--since she would be defining something that is
>> undefined and completely made-up just to trash someone's opinion she (or
>> others) disagree with.
>
> Who is this Jean you're talking about; this person's messages aren't
> making it to my newsreader.

You, no matter how it is (mis)spelled, it's you.

10-08-2008, 07:16 AM

x-no-archive: yes

"Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:FbadnQQsvKkElnHVnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>
> "WR69" <davewilson6969@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:qBOGk.3983$Ws1.3433@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>
>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
>> news:hlwdjsd-712DBC.22192106102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
>>> In article <d6CdnXWkHp5P4nfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>>> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Me, too!
>>>> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time*
>>>> >>> on
>>>> >>> this ng?
>>>> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by
>>>> >>> now>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I
>>>> >> didn't
>>>> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
>>>> >> perspective on things from time to time.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Darrell
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
>>>> > classifying guys like aslip.
>>>> >
>>>> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
>>>>
>>>> ONE time.
>>>>
>>>> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
>>>>
>>>> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in
>>>> the
>>>> Cardinals' ng?
>>>
>>> A kloo for you:
>>>
>>> Mere posting in a newsgroup, even a rival team's newsgroup, does not
>>> make one a troll. Trollish behavior makes one a troll.
>>
>>
>> I'd love to hear your definition of troll'ish behavior Jean....having
>> ones own opinion and standing by it? Not backing down from attacks to
>> one's character when voicing those opinions? Enlighten.
>>
>
>
> http://askville.amazon.com/SimilarQuestions.do?req=definition-internet-troll
>
> Enjoy. See if you can find the one that fits you.

"In brief, internet-trolling means posting irrelevant,
controversial, equivocating, ambiguous, or unclear response to a genuine set
of arguments. Those who do such things are called as "an internet troll." It
is commonly done in discussion forums or in usenet newsgroups."

That definitely does NOT describe me!
Not even close.
I don't give irrelevant, equivocating, ambiguous, or unclear
responses.
The only adjective that possibly could fit me is
'controversial', and that isn't enough by itself, anyway.
So, again, the whole 'troll' smear is just that: a personal, ad
hominem smear catch-all word just for the sake of smearing someone whose
opinion you don't want to hear.
Thanks for the confirmation on my suspicion on others (mis)using
that word!

Jeanne Douglas

10-08-2008, 08:19 AM

In article <f-ednai8aJKnzXHVnZ2dnUVZ_s3inZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:

> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
> news:FbadnQQsvKkElnHVnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
> >
> > "WR69" <davewilson6969@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:qBOGk.3983$Ws1.3433@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
> >>
> >> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
> >> news:hlwdjsd-712DBC.22192106102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> >>> In article <d6CdnXWkHp5P4nfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
> >>> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
> >>>> news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Me, too!
> >>>> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long time*
> >>>> >>> on
> >>>> >>> this ng?
> >>>> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass by
> >>>> >>> now>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I
> >>>> >> didn't
> >>>> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
> >>>> >> perspective on things from time to time.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Darrell
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
> >>>> > classifying guys like aslip.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
> >>>>
> >>>> ONE time.
> >>>>
> >>>> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
> >>>>
> >>>> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in
> >>>> the
> >>>> Cardinals' ng?
> >>>
> >>> A kloo for you:
> >>>
> >>> Mere posting in a newsgroup, even a rival team's newsgroup, does not
> >>> make one a troll. Trollish behavior makes one a troll.
> >>
> >>
> >> I'd love to hear your definition of troll'ish behavior Jean....having
> >> ones own opinion and standing by it? Not backing down from attacks to
> >> one's character when voicing those opinions? Enlighten.
> >>
> >
> >
> > http://askville.amazon.com/SimilarQuestions.do?req=definition-internet-troll
> >
> > Enjoy. See if you can find the one that fits you.
>
> "In brief, internet-trolling means posting irrelevant,
> controversial, equivocating, ambiguous, or unclear response to a genuine set
> of arguments. Those who do such things are called as "an internet troll." It
> is commonly done in discussion forums or in usenet newsgroups."
>
> That definitely does NOT describe me!
> Not even close.
> I don't give irrelevant, equivocating, ambiguous, or unclear
> responses.
> The only adjective that possibly could fit me is
> 'controversial', and that isn't enough by itself, anyway.
> So, again, the whole 'troll' smear is just that: a personal, ad
> hominem smear catch-all word just for the sake of smearing someone whose
> opinion you don't want to hear.
> Thanks for the confirmation on my suspicion on others (mis)using
> that word!

Oh, boo hoo.

--
JD

"...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
'Serenity' is the cure."

Mulligan

10-08-2008, 02:22 PM

> Who is this Jean you're talking about; this person's messages aren't
> making it to my newsreader.
>

Sorry Jean I just don't care enough about your opinion to care.

BTW you might want to cover up that brown spot on your nose with some
make-up

10-08-2008, 03:30 PM

x-no-archive: yes

"Mulligan" <davewilson%%6969%%@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:2t2Hk.1959$Ei5.781@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...
>
>
>> Who is this Jean you're talking about; this person's messages aren't
>> making it to my newsreader.
>>
>
> Sorry Jean I just don't care enough about your opinion to care.

ROTFL!

> BTW you might want to cover up that brown spot on your nose with some
> make-up

ROTFL!

10-08-2008, 04:55 PM

x-no-archive: yes

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd-6D9CB4.00190108102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> In article <f-ednai8aJKnzXHVnZ2dnUVZ_s3inZ2d@earthlink.com>,
> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
>
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> news:FbadnQQsvKkElnHVnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>> >
>> > "WR69" <davewilson6969@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>> > news:qBOGk.3983$Ws1.3433@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
>> >>
>> >> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:hlwdjsd-712DBC.22192106102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
>> >>> In article <d6CdnXWkHp5P4nfVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>> >>> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> "Eric Margheim" <nospam***emargheim@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:Tf2dnQxgWd_0qXfVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> Me, too!
>> >>>> >>> Maybe we've seen the last of Eric M. for a *long
>> >>>> >>> time*
>> >>>> >>> on
>> >>>> >>> this ng?
>> >>>> >>> I hope! <he is probably crying in his water-glass
>> >>>> >>> by
>> >>>> >>> now>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> I thought that Eric's posts this season were worth reading and I
>> >>>> >> didn't
>> >>>> >> see any trollish behavior from him. I like hearing another teams
>> >>>> >> perspective on things from time to time.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Darrell
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Thanks, Darrell. If I'm a troll then I'm not sure how we start
>> >>>> > classifying guys like aslip.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > When "A" goes into the Cubs NG to rub it in,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ONE time.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > it kind of makes you laugh when he considers me a troll.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> How many more times than 'once' have *you* posted in
>> >>>> the
>> >>>> Cardinals' ng?
>> >>>
>> >>> A kloo for you:
>> >>>
>> >>> Mere posting in a newsgroup, even a rival team's newsgroup, does not
>> >>> make one a troll. Trollish behavior makes one a troll.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I'd love to hear your definition of troll'ish behavior Jean....having
>> >> ones own opinion and standing by it? Not backing down from attacks to
>> >> one's character when voicing those opinions? Enlighten.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > http://askville.amazon.com/SimilarQuestions.do?req=definition-internet-troll
>> >
>> > Enjoy. See if you can find the one that fits you.
>>
>> "In brief, internet-trolling means posting irrelevant,
>> controversial, equivocating, ambiguous, or unclear response to a genuine
>> set
>> of arguments. Those who do such things are called as "an internet troll."
>> It
>> is commonly done in discussion forums or in usenet newsgroups."
>>
>> That definitely does NOT describe me!
>> Not even close.
>> I don't give irrelevant, equivocating, ambiguous, or unclear
>> responses.
>> The only adjective that possibly could fit me is
>> 'controversial', and that isn't enough by itself, anyway.
>> So, again, the whole 'troll' smear is just that: a personal,
>> ad
>> hominem smear catch-all word just for the sake of smearing someone whose
>> opinion you don't want to hear.
>> Thanks for the confirmation on my suspicion on others
>> (mis)using
>> that word!
>
> Oh, boo hoo.

Stop crying, you lost the re-definition game.
Too bad.

Jeanne Douglas

10-09-2008, 08:35 AM

In article <2t2Hk.1959$Ei5.781@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com>,
"Mulligan" <davewilson%%6969%%@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> > Who is this Jean you're talking about; this person's messages aren't
> > making it to my newsreader.
> >
>
> Sorry Jean I just don't care enough about your opinion to care.
>
> BTW you might want to cover up that brown spot on your nose with some
> make-up

I'm still not seeing this Jean's messages; anybody want to hazard a
guess why they're not making it through to my newsserver.

--
JD

"...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
'Serenity' is the cure."

10-09-2008, 08:39 AM

x-no-archive: yes

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd-E6DF96.00353409102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> In article <2t2Hk.1959$Ei5.781@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com>,
> "Mulligan" <davewilson%%6969%%@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> > Who is this Jean you're talking about; this person's messages aren't
>> > making it to my newsreader.
>> >
>>
>> Sorry Jean I just don't care enough about your opinion to care.
>>
>> BTW you might want to cover up that brown spot on your nose with some
>> make-up
>
> I'm still not seeing this Jean's messages;

Liar!
If you aren't seeing these messages, how can you respond?

> anybody want to hazard a
> guess why they're not making it through to my newsserver.

Tom

10-10-2008, 12:02 AM

On Oct 9, 2:35 am, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote:
> In article <2t2Hk.1959$Ei5....@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com>,
>
> "Mulligan" <davewilson%%696...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > > Who is this Jean you're talking about; this person's messages aren't
> > > making it to my newsreader.
>
> > Sorry Jean I just don't care enough about your opinion to care.
>
> > BTW you might want to cover up that brown spot on your nose with some
> > make-up
>
> I'm still not seeing this Jean's messages; anybody want to hazard a
> guess why they're not making it through to my newsserver.
>
> --
> JD
>
> "...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
> 'Serenity' is the cure."

I'm with you, Jeanne. I don't see any messages from Jean. Go figure...

Tom

Jeanne Douglas

10-10-2008, 03:35 AM

In article <v7idneW5noSsKHDVnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:

> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:hlwdjsd-E6DF96.00353409102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> > In article <2t2Hk.1959$Ei5.781@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com>,
> > "Mulligan" <davewilson%%6969%%@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> >> > Who is this Jean you're talking about; this person's messages aren't
> >> > making it to my newsreader.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Sorry Jean I just don't care enough about your opinion to care.
> >>
> >> BTW you might want to cover up that brown spot on your nose with some
> >> make-up
> >
> > I'm still not seeing this Jean's messages;
>
> Liar!
> If you aren't seeing these messages, how can you respond?

Gawd, you can't make this kind of stupid up.

> > anybody want to hazard a
> > guess why they're not making it through to my newsserver.

--
JD

"...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
'Serenity' is the cure."

10-10-2008, 04:06 AM

x-no-archive: yes

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd-854C76.19353809102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> In article <v7idneW5noSsKHDVnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
> "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
>
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
>> news:hlwdjsd-E6DF96.00353409102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
>> > In article <2t2Hk.1959$Ei5.781@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com>,
>> > "Mulligan" <davewilson%%6969%%@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Who is this Jean you're talking about; this person's messages aren't
>> >> > making it to my newsreader.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Sorry Jean I just don't care enough about your opinion to care.
>> >>
>> >> BTW you might want to cover up that brown spot on your nose with some
>> >> make-up
>> >
>> > I'm still not seeing this Jean's messages;
>>
>> Liar!
>> If you aren't seeing these messages, how can you respond?
>
> Gawd, you can't make this kind of stupid up.

I was just playing with your mind, JEANNE.
What's left of it.

Jeanne Douglas

10-10-2008, 05:16 AM

In article <8vmdneB5pPklW3PVnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:

> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:hlwdjsd-854C76.19353809102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> > In article <v7idneW5noSsKHDVnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
> > "A" <aaaz@att.net> wrote:
> >
> >> x-no-archive: yes
> >>
> >> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
> >> news:hlwdjsd-E6DF96.00353409102008@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> >> > In article <2t2Hk.1959$Ei5.781@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com>,
> >> > "Mulligan" <davewilson%%6969%%@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > Who is this Jean you're talking about; this person's messages aren't
> >> >> > making it to my newsreader.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Sorry Jean I just don't care enough about your opinion to care.
> >> >>
> >> >> BTW you might want to cover up that brown spot on your nose with some
> >> >> make-up
> >> >
> >> > I'm still not seeing this Jean's messages;
> >>
> >> Liar!
> >> If you aren't seeing these messages, how can you respond?
> >
> > Gawd, you can't make this kind of stupid up.
>
> I was just playing with your mind, JEANNE.
> What's left of it.

Yeah, right, that's what you were doing.

--
JD

"...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
'Serenity' is the cure."