They faced a a team with a good qb and receivers and ta da.. lost...
Bores lost
Lions lost
Vikes, back in the picture..
how quickly things change...

On Sep 22, 7:51 am, The_Grand_Viking_Ga...@webtv.net (Fear_The_ Swamp)
wrote:
> They faced a a team with a good qb and receivers and ta da.. lost...
> Bores lost
> Lions lost
> Vikes, back in the picture..
> how quickly things change...

Whats funny is how they can't accept the fact Viking game was a close
game but ole Fester thinks the Cowboy game was a close game if not
for 3 plays, by the Cowboys,


Mark Solie

Fear_The_ Swamp wrote:
> They faced a a team with a good qb and receivers and ta da.. lost...
> Bores lost
> Lions lost
> Vikes, back in the picture..
> how quickly things change...


NERD: Offense will get in sync.
We put one or two of those FGs into the endzone, it's a different game
entirely.

On Sep 22, 7:51 am, The_Grand_Viking_Ga...@webtv.net (Fear_The_ Swamp)
wrote:
> They faced a a team with a good qb and receivers and ta da.. lost...
> Bores lost
> Lions lost
> Vikes, back in the picture..
> how quickly things change...

> They faced a a team with a good qb and receivers and ta da.. lost...

Sounds like a reference to the Packers/Vikings game a few weeks ago...
Don't think things have changed too much, the Packers are in first for
the NFC North, if I were a Viking fan, I'd be more worried about
getting a wildcard spot not occupied by a team from the NFC East.

Re: Pack exposed as predicted

Group: alt.sports.football.mn-vikings Date: Mon, Sep 22, 2008, 12:27pm
(CDT-2) From: jusford@yahoo.com (jusford)
On Sep 22, 7:51 am, The_Grand_Viking_Ga...@webtv.net (Fear_The_ Swamp)
wrote:
They faced a a team with a good qb and receivers and ta da.. lost...
Bores lost
Lions lost
Vikes, back in the picture..
how quickly things change...
They faced a a team with a good qb and receivers and ta da.. lost...
Sounds like a reference to the Packers/Vikings game a few weeks ago...
Don't think things have changed too much, the Packers are in first for
the NFC North, if I were a Viking fan, I'd be more worried about getting
a wildcard spot not occupied by a team from the NFC East.

›› Yeah, I hear you. I'm just giving nerd and yourself a hard time.
Of course, having said that, you lose next week and we win, then it's
both 2-2. Still a long way to go yet to determine who's fighting for
just a wildcard, and who might have the best shot at the division. I
don't know what your schedule looks like from here, but ours is
impossible!
Our next few games, ( @TN, @ N.O. those two are real tough, and if we
lose those, season done. we gotta' come out of that 1-1 at worse). then
it's the Bores and Lions, Texans, which we should be okay there,
naturally depending on what we do w/TN and N.O. Honestly, it's going to
be tough, we still have you guys again of course, we have to play at
Tampa, @ Jax at Arizona and host Atlanta ( who now seems to be legit)
and hosting the Giants. I don't see it. The offense better come alive,
and the defense better live up to the hype to get a playoff berth with
this schedule.

On Sep 22, 4:40 pm, The_Grand_Viking_Ga...@webtv.net (Fear_The_ Swamp)
wrote:
> Re: Pack exposed as predicted  
>
> Group: alt.sports.football.mn-vikings Date: Mon, Sep 22, 2008, 12:27pm
> (CDT-2) From: jusf...@yahoo.com (jusford)
> On Sep 22, 7:51 am, The_Grand_Viking_Ga...@webtv.net (Fear_The_ Swamp)
> wrote:
> They faced a a team with a good qb and receivers and ta da.. lost...
> Bores lost
> Lions lost
> Vikes, back in the picture..
> how quickly things change...
> They faced a a team with a good qb and receivers and ta da.. lost...
> Sounds like a reference to the Packers/Vikings game a few weeks ago...
> Don't think things have changed too much, the Packers are in first for
> the NFC North, if I were a Viking fan, I'd be more worried about getting
> a wildcard spot not occupied by a team from the NFC East.  
>
> ›› Yeah, I hear you. I'm just giving nerd and yourself a hard time.
> Of course, having said that, you lose next week and we win, then it's
> both 2-2. Still a long way to go yet to determine who's fighting for
> just a wildcard, and who might have the best shot at the division. I
> don't know what your schedule looks like from here, but ours is
> impossible!
> Our next few games, ( @TN, @ N.O. those two are real tough, and if we
> lose those, season done. we gotta' come out of that 1-1 at worse). then
> it's the Bores and Lions, Texans, which we should be okay there,
> naturally depending on what we do w/TN and N.O. Honestly, it's going to
> be tough, we still have you guys again of course, we have to play at
> Tampa, @ Jax at Arizona and host Atlanta ( who now seems to be legit)
> and hosting the Giants. I don't see it. The offense better come alive,
> and the defense better live up to the hype to get a playoff berth with
> this schedule.

Packs toughest opp. left are:
Indianapolis
@ Tenn.

Playing MN. at the dump (I think all would agree it's gotta go) will
be tough if MN. can get the QB situation stablized. And Chicago only
game plans for the Packers. With Al Harris gone it'll be intersting to
see who steps up. Also need to get concistant with the running game,
Sunday nights game had no spark like the previous two.
Maybe Nov. 9th will mean something?

jusford wrote:
> Playing MN. at the dump (I think all would agree it's gotta go) will
> be tough if MN. can get the QB situation stablized. And Chicago only
> game plans for the Packers. With Al Harris gone it'll be intersting to
> see who steps up. Also need to get concistant with the running game,
> Sunday nights game had no spark like the previous two.
> Maybe Nov. 9th will mean something?



NERD: The Pack is getting their two starting OLmen back. And their
starting RB is getting over his hammy.