The Pats this week are 3-point underdogs against the Jets, a team that
won four games last year.

<OH MY!!!>

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:29:31 -0400, Bender <lost@sea.com> wrote:

>The Pats this week are 3-point underdogs against the Jets, a team that
>won four games last year.
>
><OH MY!!!>


isn't that what happens when the franchise qb goes down?

In article <7codc4l0f84tkadrmmlesciq957103uhb1@4ax.com>,
bo <bo@nospamcomcast.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:29:31 -0400, Bender <lost@sea.com> wrote:
>
> >The Pats this week are 3-point underdogs against the Jets, a team that
> >won four games last year.
> >
> ><OH MY!!!>
>
>
> isn't that what happens when the franchise qb goes down?

Only if that QB is the entire team! The Pats did not lose a game all
regular season last year and the Jets just plain suck. to be 3 point
dogs in week two is pahtetic. Was Brady the reason for all those wins??
I always heard that it was the genius of their head coach ;-)

<BB's mask is now off, we now will see what happens>

On Sep 9, 6:53 pm, Bender <l...@sea.com> wrote:
>
>
> Only if that QB is the entire team! The Pats did not lose a game all
> regular season last year and the Jets just plain suck. to be 3 point
> dogs in week two is pahtetic. Was Brady the reason for all those wins??  
> I always heard that it was the genius of their head coach ;-)
>
> <BB's mask is now off, we now will see what happens>

You tell us, slick....did the Pats win 3 SB's because of Brady or BB?

On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Danny Boy® wrote:
>>
>> <BB's mask is now off, we now will see what happens>
>
> You tell us, slick....did the Pats win 3 SB's because of Brady or BB?

Well since they won because they cheated, I guess you could say hoodie.

Danny Boy® <DannyBoysGuinness@gmail.com> wrote:

> You tell us, slick....did the Pats win 3 SB's because of Brady or BB?

My opinion is that it is Tom Brady. BB has never shown us anything but
mediocrity as HC without him. We should know more in the weeks to come.

<Bills will win the AFCE!>

"Bender" <lost@sea.com> wrote in message
news:lost-E9CADE.19055210092008@news.giganews.com...
> Danny Boy® <DannyBoysGuinness@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You tell us, slick....did the Pats win 3 SB's because of Brady or BB?
>
> My opinion is that it is Tom Brady. BB has never shown us anything but
> mediocrity as HC without him. We should know more in the weeks to come.
>

I can't argue about the importance of Tom Brady as how often does such a
superstar QB come around? However, I don't think the weeks to come would be
an accurate depiction of BB's ability since there isn't a team in the entire
league that would be expected to win with Matt Cassell. In fact, would
Lombardi, Walsh, or even the great Marv Levy had been able to do anything
with Cassell at the helm?