Awful lot of folks here sending Lowery to Canton already. He's a nice
looking player, but last year most of you would have been saying this
about those two plays in the end zone, "It's Chad's weak arm that
allowed the CB enough time to close on the ball and knock it away". How
about a little perspective.
--
graybeard

graybeard wrote:

> Awful lot of folks here sending Lowery to Canton already. He's a nice
> looking player, but last year most of you would have been saying this
> about those two plays in the end zone, "It's Chad's weak arm that
> allowed the CB enough time to close on the ball and knock it away". How
> about a little perspective.


Nice exaggeration. All I said is that today's work has earned him the
starting job. it should be his. He earned it in pre season and played
lights out today. I don't hear a single post putting him Canton.

graybeard wrote:
> Awful lot of folks here sending Lowery to Canton already. He's a nice
> looking player, but last year most of you would have been saying this
> about those two plays in the end zone, "It's Chad's weak arm that
> allowed the CB enough time to close on the ball and knock it away". How
> about a little perspective.


HHOw about a little reality. Lowery played a beautiful game AND made
the INT in the EZ to seal the game, Pennington or no.

Givin' it up to the kid!

Johnny Morongo <Mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com> wrote in news:ga1cac$akl
$1@aioe.org:

> graybeard wrote:
>> Awful lot of folks here sending Lowery to Canton already. He's a nice
>> looking player, but last year most of you would have been saying this
>> about those two plays in the end zone, "It's Chad's weak arm that
>> allowed the CB enough time to close on the ball and knock it away". How
>> about a little perspective.
>
>
> HHOw about a little reality. Lowery played a beautiful game AND made
> the INT in the EZ to seal the game, Pennington or no.
>
> Givin' it up to the kid!

That was Revis. Great corner play today.

On Sep 7, 4:07 pm, Tutor <tu...@removethis.nac.net> wrote:
> graybeard wrote:
> > Awful lot of folks here sending Lowery to Canton already. He's a nice
> > looking player, but last year most of you would have been saying this
> > about those two plays in the end zone, "It's Chad's weak arm that
> > allowed the CB enough time to close on the ball and knock it away". How
> > about a little perspective.
>
> Nice exaggeration.  All I said is that today's work has earned him the
> starting job. it should be his.  He earned it in pre season and played
> lights out today.  I don't hear a single post putting him Canton.

Traditionally, a starter shouldn't lose his job while injured. Though
I don't really consider Miller a true starter.

The thing which has impressed me about Lowery is his willingness to be
aggressive in coverage. He's not one of these corners who just wants
to "keep everything in front of him". Very impressive debut.

Johnny Morongo wrote:
> graybeard wrote:
>> Awful lot of folks here sending Lowery to Canton already. He's a nice
>> looking player, but last year most of you would have been saying this
>> about those two plays in the end zone, "It's Chad's weak arm that
>> allowed the CB enough time to close on the ball and knock it away". How
>> about a little perspective.

> Lowery played a beautiful game AND made the INT in the EZ to seal the game
My BAd. It was Revis who got the INT.

In article
<75608e68-7762-4e25-b7c7-4b204cac1294@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
JETSRULE06@yahoo.com wrote:

> On Sep 7, 4:07 pm, Tutor <tu...@removethis.nac.net> wrote:
> > graybeard wrote:
> > > Awful lot of folks here sending Lowery to Canton already. He's a nice
> > > looking player, but last year most of you would have been saying this
> > > about those two plays in the end zone, "It's Chad's weak arm that
> > > allowed the CB enough time to close on the ball and knock it away". How
> > > about a little perspective.
> >
> > Nice exaggeration.  All I said is that today's work has earned him the
> > starting job. it should be his.  He earned it in pre season and played
> > lights out today.  I don't hear a single post putting him Canton.
>
> Traditionally, a starter shouldn't lose his job while injured. Though
> I don't really consider Miller a true starter.
>
> The thing which has impressed me about Lowery is his willingness to be
> aggressive in coverage. He's not one of these corners who just wants
> to "keep everything in front of him". Very impressive debut.

Let Miller have a shot in the slot or in the backfield when we go three
CB. Coleman and Barrett are worthless.

h

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:55:26 -0400, graybeard <graybeard@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>Awful lot of folks here sending Lowery to Canton already. He's a nice
>looking player, but last year most of you would have been saying this
>about those two plays in the end zone, "It's Chad's weak arm that
>allowed the CB enough time to close on the ball and knock it away". How
>about a little perspective.


Me thinks there's some gray, between liking a player, and Canton, n'est-ce pas?