And a loss of a second half TO.

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:49:21 -0700, Johnny Morongo <Mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com>
wrote:

>And a loss of a second half TO.

I know you want to put that one on EM, but that's from upstairs... a stupid call
nonetheless.

buRford wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:49:21 -0700, Johnny Morongo <Mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com>
> wrote:
>
>> And a loss of a second half TO.
>
> I know you want to put that one on EM, but that's from upstairs... a stupid call
> nonetheless.

SOJ. Sorry.

But then again, it is only the first game. They have 15 more to
demonstrate their ineptitude. In the meanwhile, Brady goes down and the
Pats continue to roll.

"Johnny Morongo" <Mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com> wrote in message
news:ga191c$sjk$2@aioe.org...
> buRford wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:49:21 -0700, Johnny Morongo
>> <Mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> And a loss of a second half TO.
>>
>> I know you want to put that one on EM, but that's from upstairs... a
>> stupid call
>> nonetheless.
>
> SOJ. Sorry.
>
> But then again, it is only the first game. They have 15 more to
> demonstrate their ineptitude. In the meanwhile, Brady goes down and the
> Pats continue to roll.

Not so fast Kemosabe.

Now it is 14-10. with 6:00 minutes left. Both teams lost their starting
QB's. Cassel in for Brady and Huard in for Croyle. that's fair, right?

In article <1198c49rq2p9vg6raje5skh8evginhmq42@4ax.com>,
buRford <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:49:21 -0700, Johnny Morongo
> <Mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com>
> wrote:
>
> >And a loss of a second half TO.
>
> I know you want to put that one on EM, but that's from upstairs... a stupid
> call
> nonetheless.

Actually I think it was backing up Favre.

It made no odds. Not as dumb as some of the conservative play not to
lose play calling.

h

In article <48c42b5a$0$26970$607ed4bc@cv.net>,
"Rich - ® ©" <Rich@No.Spam.com> wrote:

> "Johnny Morongo" <Mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com> wrote in message
> news:ga191c$sjk$2@aioe.org...
> > buRford wrote:
> >> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:49:21 -0700, Johnny Morongo
> >> <Mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> And a loss of a second half TO.
> >>
> >> I know you want to put that one on EM, but that's from upstairs... a
> >> stupid call
> >> nonetheless.
> >
> > SOJ. Sorry.
> >
> > But then again, it is only the first game. They have 15 more to
> > demonstrate their ineptitude. In the meanwhile, Brady goes down and the
> > Pats continue to roll.
>
> Not so fast Kemosabe.
>
> Now it is 14-10. with 6:00 minutes left. Both teams lost their starting
> QB's. Cassel in for Brady and Huard in for Croyle. that's fair, right?

Except for the fact that the Pats get a gift from the schedulemakers and
get to play against the Chiefs and the Preacher. Not fair.

h

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:45:26 -0400, Harlan Lachman <hlachman@verizon.net> wrote:

>In article <1198c49rq2p9vg6raje5skh8evginhmq42@4ax.com>,
> buRford <buRford@buR.ford.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:49:21 -0700, Johnny Morongo
>> <Mirehiel@harmonicconcordance.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >And a loss of a second half TO.
>>
>> I know you want to put that one on EM, but that's from upstairs... a stupid
>> call
>> nonetheless.
>
>Actually I think it was backing up Favre.
>
>It made no odds. Not as dumb as some of the conservative play not to
>lose play calling.
>

Yup, Mangini has gotten more conservative, since year 1.