That advice would seem to be right on time.

<graverobber_69@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8edea2ca-259a-41d5-b9f0-4f892ee403ce@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> That advice would seem to be right on time.

Really? I haven't participated in fantasy football in a long time but I
would think that a team that is likely to be in a lot of shoot out games
would be a good team to get a QB from.

I'm just sayin'.

the rick

"wyzbang" <wyzbang@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:58Nqk.614$Ks1.442@newsfe02.iad...
>
> <graverobber_69@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:8edea2ca-259a-41d5-b9f0-4f892ee403ce@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> > That advice would seem to be right on time.
>
> Really? I haven't participated in fantasy football in a long time but I
> would think that a team that is likely to be in a lot of shoot out games
> would be a good team to get a QB from.
>
> I'm just sayin'.
>
> the rick
>
>

Maybe, but last year he did all right for the first few games. And with healthy receivers plus CJ being a "freak of nature" he might
be a good investment if you could pick him up cheap.

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:05:49 -0400, "strategy26"
<primeooze@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"wyzbang" <wyzbang@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:58Nqk.614$Ks1.442@newsfe02.iad...
>>
>> <graverobber_69@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:8edea2ca-259a-41d5-b9f0-4f892ee403ce@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> > That advice would seem to be right on time.
>>
>> Really? I haven't participated in fantasy football in a long time but I
>> would think that a team that is likely to be in a lot of shoot out games
>> would be a good team to get a QB from.
>>
>> I'm just sayin'.
>>
>> the rick
>>
>>
>
>Maybe, but last year he did all right for the first few games. And with healthy receivers plus CJ being a "freak of nature" he might
>be a good investment if you could pick him up cheap.
>

Kitna wouldn't be your first or second pick at QB in a fantasy league
but he wouldn't be a bad third pick. Most fantasy football sites have
him ranked around 19th. He does have 6 3,000 yard seasons and he is
coming off of back to back 4,000 yard seasons.

This season he may not put up as many yards as in the past due mostly
to Martz not calling the plays in Detroit any longer and a greater
emphasis on the running game. But as all Lions' fans know, there
hasn't been a decent running game in Detroit since Barry retired and
with Johnson and Williams and Furrey, you can't help but throw the
ball especially if the defense doesn't hold teams and the Lions are
playing catch up.

Regards,
////
(o o)
-oOO--(_)--OOo-

"Don't let Krusty's death get you down, boy.
People die all the time. Just like that.
Why, you could wake up dead tomorrow.
Well, good night."
-- Homer J. Simpson
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Remove nospam to email me.

Steve

On Aug 20, 9:54 am, SkippyPB <swieg...@Nospam.neo.rr.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:05:49 -0400, "strategy26"
>
>
>
>
>
> <primeo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"wyzbang" <wyzb...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:58Nqk.614$Ks1.442@newsfe02.iad...
>
> >> <graverobber...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:8edea2ca-259a-41d5-b9f0-4f892ee403ce@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com....
> >> > That advice would seem to be right on time.
>
> >> Really? I haven't participated in fantasy football in a long time but I
> >> would think that a team that is likely to be in a lot of shoot out games
> >> would be a good team to get a QB from.
>
> >> I'm just sayin'.
>
> >> the rick
>
> >Maybe, but last year he did all right for the first few games. And with healthy receivers plus CJ being a "freak of nature" he might
> >be a good investment if you could pick him up cheap.
>
> Kitna wouldn't be your first or second pick at QB in a fantasy league
> but he wouldn't be a bad third pick.  Most fantasy football sites have
> him ranked around 19th.    He does have 6 3,000 yard seasons and he is
> coming off of back to back 4,000 yard seasons.
>
> This season he may not put up as many yards as in the past due mostly
> to Martz not calling the plays in Detroit any longer and a greater
> emphasis on the running game.  But as all Lions' fans know, there
> hasn't been a decent running game in Detroit since Barry retired and
> with Johnson and Williams and Furrey, you can't help but throw the
> ball especially if the defense doesn't hold teams and the Lions are
> playing catch up.
>
> Regards,
>           ////
>          (o o)
> -oOO--(_)--OOo-
>
> "Don't let Krusty's death get you down, boy.
> People die all the time. Just like that.
> Why, you could wake up dead tomorrow.
> Well, good night."
> -- Homer J. Simpson
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Remove nospam to email me.
>
> Steve- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

His INTs is the problem. Throwing more INTs than TDs (or close
enough) is OK for a first year QB, not a 10th (or whatever). If he
threw 22 TDs and 15 INTs, he'd be a darned decent backup QB for FF.
But he won't.
BTW, did you know Mark Brunell is on an NFL roster still? Who knew?
What next, Marino?
SC

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:06:29 -0700 (PDT), Sir Creep
<sircreep@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Aug 20, 9:54 am, SkippyPB <swieg...@Nospam.neo.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:05:49 -0400, "strategy26"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <primeo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >"wyzbang" <wyzb...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:58Nqk.614$Ks1.442@newsfe02.iad...
>>
>> >> <graverobber...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:8edea2ca-259a-41d5-b9f0-4f892ee403ce@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> >> > That advice would seem to be right on time.
>>
>> >> Really? I haven't participated in fantasy football in a long time but I
>> >> would think that a team that is likely to be in a lot of shoot out games
>> >> would be a good team to get a QB from.
>>
>> >> I'm just sayin'.
>>
>> >> the rick
>>
>> >Maybe, but last year he did all right for the first few games. And with healthy receivers plus CJ being a "freak of nature" he might
>> >be a good investment if you could pick him up cheap.
>>
>> Kitna wouldn't be your first or second pick at QB in a fantasy league
>> but he wouldn't be a bad third pick.  Most fantasy football sites have
>> him ranked around 19th.    He does have 6 3,000 yard seasons and he is
>> coming off of back to back 4,000 yard seasons.
>>
>> This season he may not put up as many yards as in the past due mostly
>> to Martz not calling the plays in Detroit any longer and a greater
>> emphasis on the running game.  But as all Lions' fans know, there
>> hasn't been a decent running game in Detroit since Barry retired and
>> with Johnson and Williams and Furrey, you can't help but throw the
>> ball especially if the defense doesn't hold teams and the Lions are
>> playing catch up.
>>
>> Regards,
>>           ////
>>          (o o)
>> -oOO--(_)--OOo-
>>
>> "Don't let Krusty's death get you down, boy.
>> People die all the time. Just like that.
>> Why, you could wake up dead tomorrow.
>> Well, good night."
>> -- Homer J. Simpson
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Remove nospam to email me.
>>
>> Steve- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>His INTs is the problem. Throwing more INTs than TDs (or close
>enough) is OK for a first year QB, not a 10th (or whatever). If he
>threw 22 TDs and 15 INTs, he'd be a darned decent backup QB for FF.
>But he won't.
>BTW, did you know Mark Brunell is on an NFL roster still? Who knew?
>What next, Marino?
>SC

INTs only matter in fantasy football if your league scores deductions
for them. Most don't.

Brunell will only be 38 in September. Older guys have played and
started at QB.

Regards,
////
(o o)
-oOO--(_)--OOo-

"Don't let Krusty's death get you down, boy.
People die all the time. Just like that.
Why, you could wake up dead tomorrow.
Well, good night."
-- Homer J. Simpson
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Remove nospam to email me.

Steve

On Aug 21, 9:57 am, SkippyPB made more fucking retarded statements
than a person can shake a stick at when he wrote:
> >His INTs is the problem.  Throwing more INTs than TDs (or close
> >enough) is OK for a first year QB, not a 10th (or whatever).  If he
> >threw 22 TDs and 15 INTs, he'd be a darned decent backup QB for FF.
> >But he won't.
> >BTW, did you know Mark Brunell is on an NFL roster still?  Who knew?
> >What next, Marino?
> >SC
>
> INTs only matter in fantasy football if your league scores deductions
> for them.  Most don't.

I've been doing this for 18 years, neophyte, and yes, most DO.

> Brunell will only be 38 in September.  Older guys have played and
> started at QB.

ONLY 38 (lmao).
Older guys have started ---Yes....Geroge Blanda comes to mind.
What you forgot is that most 'older guys who have played and started
at QB' weren't totally washed up 4 yers prior. So you of course make
stupid comments only to be contentious. Get a hobby.
Note: My alma mater's Charlie Batch (35) was also going to be on
Pitt's roster, which probably is more of an indictment on the state of
talent at the QB position in the NFL than anything else. In fact, I
believe Todd Collins is also a backup somewhere. Jeesh. Skippy will
tell us that is fine by him cuz 'older guys have started' at QB, no
matter their talent, right Skippy? Dumb ass.

SC

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:24:28 -0700 (PDT), Sir Creep
<sircreep@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Aug 21, 9:57 am, SkippyPB made more fucking retarded statements
>than a person can shake a stick at when he wrote:
>> >His INTs is the problem.  Throwing more INTs than TDs (or close
>> >enough) is OK for a first year QB, not a 10th (or whatever).  If he
>> >threw 22 TDs and 15 INTs, he'd be a darned decent backup QB for FF.
>> >But he won't.
>> >BTW, did you know Mark Brunell is on an NFL roster still?  Who knew?
>> >What next, Marino?
>> >SC
>>
>> INTs only matter in fantasy football if your league scores deductions
>> for them.  Most don't.
>
>I've been doing this for 18 years, neophyte, and yes, most DO.
>

I've been doing it about that long as well so prove that MOST do. My
current league doesn't and in fact we just voted on the QB deduction
for an interception and it was voted down.

>> Brunell will only be 38 in September.  Older guys have played and
>> started at QB.
>
>ONLY 38 (lmao).
>Older guys have started ---Yes....Geroge Blanda comes to mind.
>What you forgot is that most 'older guys who have played and started
>at QB' weren't totally washed up 4 yers prior. So you of course make
>stupid comments only to be contentious. Get a hobby.
>Note: My alma mater's Charlie Batch (35) was also going to be on
>Pitt's roster, which probably is more of an indictment on the state of
>talent at the QB position in the NFL than anything else. In fact, I
>believe Todd Collins is also a backup somewhere. Jeesh. Skippy will
>tell us that is fine by him cuz 'older guys have started' at QB, no
>matter their talent, right Skippy? Dumb ass.
>

Nobodies talking about talent. Your ignorant attempt at making fun of
Mark Brunell because he is an "older" guy being in the league was
lame. Vinny Testeverde played 7 games for the Panthers last season at
the age of 44.

As for Todd Collins, he started 3 games for the Redskins last season,
is still on their roster and will be only 38 in November.

>SC

Regards,
////
(o o)
-oOO--(_)--OOo-

"Don't let Krusty's death get you down, boy.
People die all the time. Just like that.
Why, you could wake up dead tomorrow.
Well, good night."
-- Homer J. Simpson
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Remove nospam to email me.

Steve

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:55:20 -0400, SkippyPB
<swiegand@Nospam.neo.rr.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:24:28 -0700 (PDT), Sir Creep
><sircreep@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Aug 21, 9:57 am, SkippyPB made more fucking retarded statements
>>than a person can shake a stick at when he wrote:
>>> >His INTs is the problem.  Throwing more INTs than TDs (or close
>>> >enough) is OK for a first year QB, not a 10th (or whatever).  If he
>>> >threw 22 TDs and 15 INTs, he'd be a darned decent backup QB for FF.
>>> >But he won't.
>>> >BTW, did you know Mark Brunell is on an NFL roster still?  Who knew?
>>> >What next, Marino?
>>> >SC
>>>
>>> INTs only matter in fantasy football if your league scores deductions
>>> for them.  Most don't.
>>
>>I've been doing this for 18 years, neophyte, and yes, most DO.
>>
>
>I've been doing it about that long as well so prove that MOST do. My
>current league doesn't and in fact we just voted on the QB deduction
>for an interception and it was voted down.
>
>>> Brunell will only be 38 in September.  Older guys have played and
>>> started at QB.
>>
>>ONLY 38 (lmao).
>>Older guys have started ---Yes....Geroge Blanda comes to mind.
>>What you forgot is that most 'older guys who have played and started
>>at QB' weren't totally washed up 4 yers prior. So you of course make
>>stupid comments only to be contentious. Get a hobby.
>>Note: My alma mater's Charlie Batch (35) was also going to be on
>>Pitt's roster, which probably is more of an indictment on the state of
>>talent at the QB position in the NFL than anything else. In fact, I
>>believe Todd Collins is also a backup somewhere. Jeesh. Skippy will
>>tell us that is fine by him cuz 'older guys have started' at QB, no
>>matter their talent, right Skippy? Dumb ass.
>>
>
>Nobodies talking about talent. Your ignorant attempt at making fun of
>Mark Brunell because he is an "older" guy being in the league was
>lame. Vinny Testeverde played 7 games for the Panthers last season at
>the age of 44.
>
>As for Todd Collins, he started 3 games for the Redskins last season,
>is still on their roster and will be only 38 in November.
>
>>SC
>
>Regards,
> ////
> (o o)
>-oOO--(_)--OOo-
>
>"Don't let Krusty's death get you down, boy.
>People die all the time. Just like that.
>Why, you could wake up dead tomorrow.
>Well, good night."
>-- Homer J. Simpson
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>Remove nospam to email me.
>
>Steve

Maybe he'll leave this group since he's no longer a Lions fan? I sure
hope so, here is the only message he's written so far in the Saints
group looking for a friend;


"Where are the 69 (now 70 with me) subscribers? Kickoff about 10 days
away, and nuthin'.

Hope it picks up in here.
A brand new and terribly dedicated Saints fan."
Sir Creep

On Aug 23, 11:55 am, SkippyPB <swieg...@Nospam.neo.rr.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:24:28 -0700 (PDT), Sir Creep
>
>
>
> <sircr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Aug 21, 9:57 am, SkippyPB made more fucking retarded statements
> >than a person can shake a stick at when he wrote:
> >> >His INTs is the problem. Throwing more INTs than TDs (or close
> >> >enough) is OK for a first year QB, not a 10th (or whatever). If he
> >> >threw 22 TDs and 15 INTs, he'd be a darned decent backup QB for FF.
> >> >But he won't.
> >> >BTW, did you know Mark Brunell is on an NFL roster still? Who knew?
> >> >What next, Marino?
> >> >SC
>
> >> INTs only matter in fantasy football if your league scores deductions
> >> for them. Most don't.
>
> >I've been doing this for 18 years, neophyte, and yes, most DO.
>
> I've been doing it about that long as well so prove that MOST do. My
> current league doesn't and in fact we just voted on the QB deduction
> for an interception and it was voted down.
>
> >> Brunell will only be 38 in September. Older guys have played and
> >> started at QB.
>
> >ONLY 38 (lmao).
> >Older guys have started ---Yes....Geroge Blanda comes to mind.
> >What you forgot is that most 'older guys who have played and started
> >at QB' weren't totally washed up 4 yers prior. So you of course make
> >stupid comments only to be contentious. Get a hobby.
> >Note: My alma mater's Charlie Batch (35) was also going to be on
> >Pitt's roster, which probably is more of an indictment on the state of
> >talent at the QB position in the NFL than anything else. In fact, I
> >believe Todd Collins is also a backup somewhere. Jeesh. Skippy will
> >tell us that is fine by him cuz 'older guys have started' at QB, no
> >matter their talent, right Skippy? Dumb ass.
>
> Nobodies talking about talent.

You stupid fucking stupid fuck jackass of a wart on a moron's
ass....talent was EXACTLY the point being made. Jesus Christ, learn
how to fucking read.
SC

On Aug 23, 11:55 am, SkippyPB <swieg...@Nospam.neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Nobodies talking about talent.


Wait, I'm not done with this Goddamn retarded comment of yours. You
should check yourself before you wreck yourself....the subject of this
thread is ESPN telling people NOT to draft Kitna.....you think the
reason was cuz of his AGE??? You stupid fucking fuck.
There, I'm done.
SC

On Aug 20, 10:54 am, SkippyPB <swieg...@Nospam.neo.rr.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:05:49 -0400, "strategy26"
>
>
>
>
>
> <primeo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"wyzbang" <wyzb...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:58Nqk.614$Ks1.442@newsfe02.iad...
>
> >> <graverobber...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:8edea2ca-259a-41d5-b9f0-4f892ee403ce@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com....
> >> > That advice would seem to be right on time.
>
> >> Really? I haven't participated in fantasy football in a long time but I
> >> would think that a team that is likely to be in a lot of shoot out games
> >> would be a good team to get a QB from.
>
> >> I'm just sayin'.
>
> >> the rick
>
> >Maybe, but last year he did all right for the first few games. And with healthy receivers plus CJ being a "freak of nature" he might
> >be a good investment if you could pick him up cheap.
>
> Kitna wouldn't be your first or second pick at QB in a fantasy league
> but he wouldn't be a bad third pick.  Most fantasy football sites have
> him ranked around 19th.    He does have 6 3,000 yard seasons and he is
> coming off of back to back 4,000 yard seasons.
>
> This season he may not put up as many yards as in the past due mostly
> to Martz not calling the plays in Detroit any longer and a greater
> emphasis on the running game.  But as all Lions' fans know, there
> hasn't been a decent running game in Detroit since Barry retired and
> with Johnson and Williams and Furrey, you can't help but throw the
> ball especially if the defense doesn't hold teams and the Lions are
> playing catch up.
>
> Regards,
>           ////
>          (o o)
> -oOO--(_)--OOo-
>
> "Don't let Krusty's death get you down, boy.
> People die all the time. Just like that.
> Why, you could wake up dead tomorrow.
> Well, good night."
> -- Homer J. Simpson
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Remove nospam to email me.
>
> Steve- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yeah, it's pretty bad the position the ownership of the Lions have
put you guys in, after so many seasons of being loyal to them.

On Aug 20, 12:06 pm, Sir Creep <sircr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 20, 9:54 am, SkippyPB <swieg...@Nospam.neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:05:49 -0400, "strategy26"
>
> > <primeo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >"wyzbang" <wyzb...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:58Nqk.614$Ks1.442@newsfe02.iad...
>
> > >> <graverobber...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >>news:8edea2ca-259a-41d5-b9f0-4f892ee403ce@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> > >> > That advice would seem to be right on time.
>
> > >> Really? I haven't participated in fantasy football in a long time but I
> > >> would think that a team that is likely to be in a lot of shoot out games
> > >> would be a good team to get a QB from.
>
> > >> I'm just sayin'.
>
> > >> the rick
>
> > >Maybe, but last year he did all right for the first few games. And with healthy receivers plus CJ being a "freak of nature" he might
> > >be a good investment if you could pick him up cheap.
>
> > Kitna wouldn't be your first or second pick at QB in a fantasy league
> > but he wouldn't be a bad third pick.  Most fantasy football sites have
> > him ranked around 19th.    He does have 6 3,000 yard seasons and heis
> > coming off of back to back 4,000 yard seasons.
>
> > This season he may not put up as many yards as in the past due mostly
> > to Martz not calling the plays in Detroit any longer and a greater
> > emphasis on the running game.  But as all Lions' fans know, there
> > hasn't been a decent running game in Detroit since Barry retired and
> > with Johnson and Williams and Furrey, you can't help but throw the
> > ball especially if the defense doesn't hold teams and the Lions are
> > playing catch up.
>
> > Regards,
> >           ////
> >          (o o)
> > -oOO--(_)--OOo-
>
> > "Don't let Krusty's death get you down, boy.
> > People die all the time. Just like that.
> > Why, you could wake up dead tomorrow.
> > Well, good night."
> > -- Homer J. Simpson
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> > Remove nospam to email me.
>
> > Steve- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> His INTs is the problem.  Throwing more INTs than TDs (or close
> enough) is OK for a first year QB, not a 10th (or whatever).  If he
> threw 22 TDs and 15 INTs, he'd be a darned decent backup QB for FF.

In that respect, throwing more INTs than TDs, he is like Breff Favre.
Would rather throw a pick then take a hit.

> But he won't.
> BTW, did you know Mark Brunell is on an NFL roster still?  Who knew?
> What next, Marino?
> SC- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

<sauteedshrimp@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:75e6ae05-a7df-4a14-b894-4a23f21d15e9@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 20, 12:06 pm, Sir Creep <sircr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 20, 9:54 am, SkippyPB <swieg...@Nospam.neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:05:49 -0400, "strategy26"
>
> > <primeo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >"wyzbang" <wyzb...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> > >messagenews:58Nqk.614$Ks1.442@newsfe02.iad...
>
> > >> <graverobber...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >>news:8edea2ca-259a-41d5-b9f0-4f892ee403ce@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> > >> > That advice would seem to be right on time.
>
> > >> Really? I haven't participated in fantasy football in a long time but
> > >> I
> > >> would think that a team that is likely to be in a lot of shoot out
> > >> games
> > >> would be a good team to get a QB from.
>
> > >> I'm just sayin'.
>
> > >> the rick
>
> > >Maybe, but last year he did all right for the first few games. And with
> > >healthy receivers plus CJ being a "freak of nature" he might
> > >be a good investment if you could pick him up cheap.
>
> > Kitna wouldn't be your first or second pick at QB in a fantasy league
> > but he wouldn't be a bad third pick. Most fantasy football sites have
> > him ranked around 19th. He does have 6 3,000 yard seasons and he is
> > coming off of back to back 4,000 yard seasons.
>
> > This season he may not put up as many yards as in the past due mostly
> > to Martz not calling the plays in Detroit any longer and a greater
> > emphasis on the running game. But as all Lions' fans know, there
> > hasn't been a decent running game in Detroit since Barry retired and
> > with Johnson and Williams and Furrey, you can't help but throw the
> > ball especially if the defense doesn't hold teams and the Lions are
> > playing catch up.
>
> > Regards,
> > ////
> > (o o)
> > -oOO--(_)--OOo-
>
> > "Don't let Krusty's death get you down, boy.
> > People die all the time. Just like that.
> > Why, you could wake up dead tomorrow.
> > Well, good night."
> > -- Homer J. Simpson
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> > Remove nospam to email me.
>
> > Steve- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> His INTs is the problem. Throwing more INTs than TDs (or close
> enough) is OK for a first year QB, not a 10th (or whatever). If he
> threw 22 TDs and 15 INTs, he'd be a darned decent backup QB for FF.

In that respect, throwing more INTs than TDs, he is like Breff Favre.
Would rather throw a pick then take a hit.

Kitna would rather throw a pick than take a hit? Guess you do not watch
many Lion's games, if that is what you are implying.


> But he won't.
> BTW, did you know Mark Brunell is on an NFL roster still? Who knew?
> What next, Marino?
> SC- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -