The Arizona game was fun to watch. It's great just to see some Saint's
football that is not re-runs. They looked an awfull lot like last years
team on both sides of the ball is bot good and bad news.
On offense
Bree fantastic
Bush improved for this game anyway
PT hard to tell, but not a great game rushing (team problem) but
nice return
AA good till limped off
RM threw off the bust label and that's fantastic
OL looked good in pass protection only
On Defense
DL Looked good. Nice to see some variety in rushing. Now if
could only be effective.
LB's looked good even without Vilma.
Young was a busy guy. not effective but looked good trying
David looks less lost, could be improved
Gay didn't see enought o have a clue
Safeties Need work need work need work
I know it's pre-season and one off the plays was a new wrinkle (zone blitz
where Smith got smoked by wide receiver for 32 yds), but two pass plays for
greater than 20 yards by first team D is not a good sign for a team that
consistantly got smoked by the long pass last year. If the long plays had
come later in the game I wouldn't be as bothered.
echo check Hellooooooo........... Helloooo...... Hello...
Kris
Mark G2
08-09-2008, 04:10 PM
In article <Xns9AF563B399045Nunyanunyanet@207.115.33.102>,
Kris <Nunya@nunya.net> wrote:
> The Arizona game was fun to watch. It's great just to see some Saint's
> football that is not re-runs. They looked an awfull lot like last years
> team on both sides of the ball is bot good and bad news.
>
> On offense
>
> Bree fantastic
> Bush improved for this game anyway
> PT hard to tell, but not a great game rushing (team problem) but
> nice return
> AA good till limped off
> RM threw off the bust label and that's fantastic
> OL looked good in pass protection only
>
> On Defense
>
> DL Looked good. Nice to see some variety in rushing. Now if
> could only be effective.
> LB's looked good even without Vilma.
> Young was a busy guy. not effective but looked good trying
> David looks less lost, could be improved
> Gay didn't see enought o have a clue
> Safeties Need work need work need work
>
> I know it's pre-season and one off the plays was a new wrinkle (zone blitz
> where Smith got smoked by wide receiver for 32 yds), but two pass plays for
> greater than 20 yards by first team D is not a good sign for a team that
> consistantly got smoked by the long pass last year. If the long plays had
> come later in the game I wouldn't be as bothered.
>
> echo check Hellooooooo........... Helloooo...... Hello...
>
> Kris
Not good when they can't get a one yard gain for a score either.The
defence better b able 2 bring more pressure than last year,cause i still
see this secondary getting burned.
--
Next Year!?!?!
stanley j
08-10-2008, 05:25 PM
i'm just glad we did not open with a double reverse!!!!
"Mark G2" <bird576@fox.not> wrote in message
news:bird576-F6BEDC.10105409082008@news.east.cox.net...
> In article <Xns9AF563B399045Nunyanunyanet@207.115.33.102>,
> Kris <Nunya@nunya.net> wrote:
>
>> The Arizona game was fun to watch. It's great just to see some Saint's
>> football that is not re-runs. They looked an awfull lot like last years
>> team on both sides of the ball is bot good and bad news.
>>
>> On offense
>>
>> Bree fantastic
>> Bush improved for this game anyway
>> PT hard to tell, but not a great game rushing (team problem) but
>> nice return
>> AA good till limped off
>> RM threw off the bust label and that's fantastic
>> OL looked good in pass protection only
>>
>> On Defense
>>
>> DL Looked good. Nice to see some variety in rushing. Now if
>> could only be effective.
>> LB's looked good even without Vilma.
>> Young was a busy guy. not effective but looked good trying
>> David looks less lost, could be improved
>> Gay didn't see enought o have a clue
>> Safeties Need work need work need work
>>
>> I know it's pre-season and one off the plays was a new wrinkle (zone
>> blitz
>> where Smith got smoked by wide receiver for 32 yds), but two pass plays
>> for
>> greater than 20 yards by first team D is not a good sign for a team that
>> consistantly got smoked by the long pass last year. If the long plays
>> had
>> come later in the game I wouldn't be as bothered.
>>
>> echo check Hellooooooo........... Helloooo...... Hello...
>>
>> Kris
>
> Not good when they can't get a one yard gain for a score either.The
> defence better b able 2 bring more pressure than last year,cause i still
> see this secondary getting burned.
>
> --
> Next Year!?!?!
Mark G2
08-11-2008, 01:27 AM
In article <0EEnk.11000$Bt6.6443@newsfe04.iad>,
"stanley j" <stanley2j@cox.net> wrote:
> i'm just glad we did not open with a double reverse!!!!
I think they took that play out and put in 'the statue of liberty'.
--
Next Year!?!?!