Is it now

Duhon
Crawford
Q
Zach
Curry

Or does Lee or Chandler get the nod over Q???

Rizzo

On Jul 31, 8:16 pm, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is it now
>
> Duhon
> Crawford
> Q
> Zach
> Curry
>
> Or does Lee or Chandler get the nod over Q???
>
> Rizzo

What's the difference? If what we are told is to be believed, and
what is obviously necessary is going to finally come to pass, this is
a long-term plan, not a short-term one. What happens in the short-
term (ie next season) doesn't matter.

These guys are not headed for the title. Which one starts en route to
an inevitable lottery or first-round-exit season doesn't much matter.
What matters is that if the team and management takes the right
direction, we won't have to sit here discussing this in the same way
in a few more years.

On Jul 31, 11:57 pm, Noah <dontsendmeyers...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 8:16 pm, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it now
>
> > Duhon
> > Crawford
> > Q
> > Zach
> > Curry
>
> > Or does Lee or Chandler get the nod over Q???
>
> > Rizzo
>
> What's the difference? If what we are told is to be believed, and
> what is obviously necessary is going to finally come to pass, this is
> a long-term plan, not a short-term one. What happens in the short-
> term (ie next season) doesn't matter.
>
> These guys are not headed for the title. Which one starts en route to
> an inevitable lottery or first-round-exit season doesn't much matter.
> What matters is that if the team and management takes the right
> direction, we won't have to sit here discussing this in the same way
> in a few more years.

Does that mean you don't know, or you do and you're just not saying?

Noah:

> we won't have to sit here discussing this in the same way
> in a few more years.

Someone called...

DG

On Aug 1, 3:02 am, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Does that mean you don't know, or you do and you're just not saying?

I guess that means you missed the point entirely.

On Aug 1, 8:55 am, Noah <dontsendmeyers...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 1, 3:02 am, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Does that mean you don't know, or you do and you're just not saying?
>
> I guess that means you missed the point entirely.

I understood your point Noah, just don't agree with it. I was asking
who is the starting 5. You missed that point.

On Jul 31, 11:57 pm, Noah <dontsendmeyers...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 8:16 pm, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it now
>
> > Duhon
> > Crawford
> > Q
> > Zach
> > Curry
>
> > Or does Lee or Chandler get the nod over Q???
>
> > Rizzo
>
> What's the difference? If what we are told is to be believed, and
> what is obviously necessary is going to finally come to pass, this is
> a long-term plan, not a short-term one. What happens in the short-
> term (ie next season) doesn't matter.
So don't watch the games


>
> These guys are not headed for the title. Which one starts en route to
> an inevitable lottery or first-round-exit season doesn't much matter.
> What matters is that if the team and management takes the right
> direction, we won't have to sit here discussing this in the same way
> in a few more years.

On Aug 1, 6:35 pm, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 1, 8:55 am, Noah <dontsendmeyers...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 1, 3:02 am, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Does that mean you don't know, or you do and you're just not saying?
>
> > I guess that means you missed the point entirely.
>
> I understood your point Noah, just don't agree with it.  I was asking
> who is the starting 5.  You missed that point.

Hey, we can make this into a contest.
Winner gets to top post for a month :)

On Aug 1, 6:35 pm, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I understood your point Noah, just don't agree with it.  I was asking
> who is the starting 5.

And my response to that question is how would anybody know and why
would anybody care?

On Aug 2, 10:27 am, Glenn Greenstein <lexa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 1, 6:35 pm, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 1, 8:55 am, Noah <dontsendmeyers...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 1, 3:02 am, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Does that mean you don't know, or you do and you're just not saying?
>
> > > I guess that means you missed the point entirely.
>
> > I understood your point Noah, just don't agree with it. I was asking
> > who is the starting 5. You missed that point.
>
> Hey, we can make this into a contest.
> Winner gets to top post for a month :)

You first Glenn..

"Noah Timan" <dontwritemehereok@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:961c04d0-4ad7-42cf-97d3-3dd7b0d2ad34@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 1, 6:35 pm, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I understood your point Noah, just don't agree with it. I was asking
> who is the starting 5.

And my response to that question is how would anybody know and why
would anybody care?

Noah, why even be a fan then until this team is blown up?
Personally, I am hoping to see change on the court. I expect to see the
players care about the game for a change. I want to see a real effort, I
want the team to at least look like they know what they are doing on D (not
likely but I can hope).
If we field a team of Steph, Jamal, Q, Zach, and Curry, I doubt we will see
any of that, but I will say a team of Duhon, Crawford, Chandler, Lee and
Curry (we have to play him or have no hope of trading him) we at least have
a chance of seeing this team go out and play with some resemblance of a
basketball team.

"Frank Rizzo" <champ91917@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:33e89c26-2a06-43ff-9215-60d7a56581b9@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 2, 10:27 am, Glenn Greenstein <lexa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 1, 6:35 pm, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Aug 1, 8:55 am, Noah <dontsendmeyers...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Aug 1, 3:02 am, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > Does that mean you don't know, or you do and you're just not
>> > > > saying?
>>
>> > > I guess that means you missed the point entirely.
>>
>> > I understood your point Noah, just don't agree with it. I was asking
>> > who is the starting 5. You missed that point.
>>
>> Hey, we can make this into a contest.
>> Winner gets to top post for a month :)
>
> You first Glenn..
OK, I'll start it off.
Duhon
Crawford
Q
Chandler
Curry

Curry may be replaced with Zach if Curry comes to camp out of shape and Zach
is not traded.

On Aug 4, 10:37 am, "Glenn Greenstein" <glen.jack...@worldnet.att.net>
wrote:
> "Frank Rizzo" <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:33e89c26-2a06-43ff-9215-60d7a56581b9@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com...> On Aug 2, 10:27 am, Glenn Greenstein <lexa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Aug 1, 6:35 pm, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Aug 1, 8:55 am, Noah <dontsendmeyers...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > On Aug 1, 3:02 am, Frank Rizzo <champ91...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > Does that mean you don't know, or you do and you're just not
> >> > > > saying?
>
> >> > > I guess that means you missed the point entirely.
>
> >> > I understood your point Noah, just don't agree with it.  I was asking
> >> > who is the starting 5.  You missed that point.
>
> >> Hey, we can make this into a contest.
> >> Winner gets to top post for a month :)
>
> > You first Glenn..
>
> OK, I'll start it off.
> Duhon
> Crawford
> Q
> Chandler
> Curry
>
> Curry may be replaced with Zach if Curry comes to camp out of shape and Zach
> is not traded.
>

>Duhon at the 1, Crawford at the 2, Chandler at the 3, Lee at the 4 and Curry or Randolph at the 5(it doesn't really matter both are not good team players). If Marbury cannot be traded or bought out he must be sat as a lessonto the other players. Team first must be expressed the culture must be changed.

jtdola@gmail.com ha detto questo sabato :
..
>>
>
>> Duhon at the 1, Crawford at the 2, Chandler at the 3, Lee at the 4 and Curry
>> or Randolph at the 5(it doesn't really matter both are not good team
>> players). If Marbury cannot be traded or bought out he must be sat as a
>> lesson to the other players. Team first must be expressed the culture must
>> be changed.

Gallinari at the 3 please...

On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:51:00 +0200, localmachine
<localmachine@gmail.com> wrote:

>jtdola@gmail.com ha detto questo sabato :
>.
>>>
>>
>>> Duhon at the 1, Crawford at the 2, Chandler at the 3, Lee at the 4 and Curry
>>> or Randolph at the 5(it doesn't really matter both are not good team
>>> players). If Marbury cannot be traded or bought out he must be sat as a
>>> lesson to the other players. Team first must be expressed the culture must
>>> be changed.
>
>Gallinari at the 3 please...
>

Can't work he is a broken down euro player at this point.. Bulging
disk back problems at 19??? That is for us older folk. Anyway, I am
not that positive. I have historically been the positive one on this
group but gallinari just wories me. He does have talent though, but so
did the goat. Anybody old like me might know who the goat is....
Jabaar said he was the most talented basketball player he ever saw or
played against.

Dopo dura riflessione, Syfo-Dyas ha scritto :
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:51:00 +0200, localmachine
> <localmachine@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> jtdola@gmail.com ha detto questo sabato :
>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Duhon at the 1, Crawford at the 2, Chandler at the 3, Lee at the 4 and
>>>> Curry or Randolph at the 5(it doesn't really matter both are not good
>>>> team players). If Marbury cannot be traded or bought out he must be sat
>>>> as a lesson to the other players. Team first must be expressed the
>>>> culture must be changed.
>>
>> Gallinari at the 3 please...
>>
>
> Can't work he is a broken down euro player at this point.. Bulging
> disk back problems at 19??? That is for us older folk. Anyway, I am
> not that positive. I have historically been the positive one on this
> group but gallinari just wories me. He does have talent though, but so
> did the goat. Anybody old like me might know who the goat is....
> Jabaar said he was the most talented basketball player he ever saw or
> played against.

I think it is normal that Gallinari may seem like a mysterious object.
It is also normal to make inferences about his state of health. But I
think that many will have to swallow the whistles with which you have
accepted.

On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:01:14 +0200, localmachine
<localmachine@gmail.com> wrote:

>Dopo dura riflessione, Syfo-Dyas ha scritto :
>> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:51:00 +0200, localmachine
>> <localmachine@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> jtdola@gmail.com ha detto questo sabato :
>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Duhon at the 1, Crawford at the 2, Chandler at the 3, Lee at the 4 and
>>>>> Curry or Randolph at the 5(it doesn't really matter both are not good
>>>>> team players). If Marbury cannot be traded or bought out he must be sat
>>>>> as a lesson to the other players. Team first must be expressed the
>>>>> culture must be changed.
>>>
>>> Gallinari at the 3 please...
>>>
>>
>> Can't work he is a broken down euro player at this point.. Bulging
>> disk back problems at 19??? That is for us older folk. Anyway, I am
>> not that positive. I have historically been the positive one on this
>> group but gallinari just wories me. He does have talent though, but so
>> did the goat. Anybody old like me might know who the goat is....
>> Jabaar said he was the most talented basketball player he ever saw or
>> played against.
>
>I think it is normal that Gallinari may seem like a mysterious object.
>It is also normal to make inferences about his state of health. But I
>think that many will have to swallow the whistles with which you have
>accepted.
>

I would love that to be correct. Nevertheless I did say that he is
indeed talented, however it has yet to be shown on an NBA court.