Is War With Iran Imminent?

[url]http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12755[/url]

In article
<d05d379d-669c-424d-99a3-cdfb721b7ab4@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
Wayne <waynetv50@yahoo.com> wrote:

> [url]http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12755[/url]

Harmless skirmishes.

Same rhetoric as the last 40 years or so. Only now its IMMEDIATE and
ORANGE ALERT with BUSH leaving office.

Him and Cheney actually BELEIVE in this armaggheddon tooth-fairy attack
sparking off a nuke-you-lair thing with Santa Claus at the helm.

Unbeleivable.

On Apr 28, 5:11 pm, Coffee in Madrid <gde...@THISeastlink.ca> wrote:
> In article
> <d05d379d-669c-424d-99a3-cdfb721b7...@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Wayne <waynet...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >[url]http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12755[/url]
>
> Harmless skirmishes.
>
> Same rhetoric as the last 40 years or so. Only now its IMMEDIATE and
> ORANGE ALERT with BUSH leaving office.
>
> Him and Cheney actually BELEIVE in this armaggheddon tooth-fairy attack
> sparking off a nuke-you-lair thing with Santa Claus at the helm.
>
> Unbeleivable.



>Great way to leave office..the same way he came in..he and Cheney never meeting
a war that they didn't love. So on 1/20/09 how many US soldiers and
marines will
have died not only in Iraq..but Iran too.

On Apr 28, 2:30 pm, Wayne <waynet...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [url]http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12755[/url]

Gee, I don't know. Can the US afford to lose yet another war?

Wayne wrote:
> [url]http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12755[/url]

As G.W. Bush is leaving office soon, I'll say no. Had he been sticking
around for a while, I'd have said yes. The US doesn't need it, or want
it! So I hope it doesn't happen.

"Wayne" <waynetv50@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d05d379d-669c-424d-99a3-cdfb721b7ab4@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> [url]http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12755[/url]

No. No war.

Just some bombing.

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:30:16 -0400, "Patriot Games"
<Patriot@America.com> wrote:

>No. No war.
>
>Just some bombing.

At least not a Constitutionally legal war.

I saw today our president blamed Congress for the economy. He's
absolutely correct. If they had done their job and stopped the
President from spending our children's money on Iraq, our economy
would be strong.

"Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote in message
news:33ff14d73fno4afmafn3pj5l8njc878jsg@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:30:16 -0400, "Patriot Games"
> <Patriot@America.com> wrote:
>>No. No war.
>>Just some bombing.
> At least not a Constitutionally legal war.
> I saw today our president blamed Congress for the economy.

No you didn't. You saw him blame Democrats for doing nothing to help the
economy.

> He's
> absolutely correct. If they had done their job and stopped the
> President from spending our children's money on Iraq, our economy
> would be strong.

The Democrats FULLY FUNDED the Iraq War THREE TIMES IN A ROW.

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:01:40 -0400, "Patriot Games"
<Patriot@America.com> wrote:

>> I saw today our president blamed Congress for the economy.
>
>No you didn't. You saw him blame Democrats for doing nothing to help the
>economy.

The implication is that the economy is the way it is because they did
nothing to help it. Which makes your "No you didn't" the same as
"Yes you did".

>> He's
>> absolutely correct. If they had done their job and stopped the
>> President from spending our children's money on Iraq, our economy
>> would be strong.
>
>The Democrats FULLY FUNDED the Iraq War THREE TIMES IN A ROW.

That's my point. They could have helped the economy by doing their
job and saying "no".