| Flash Arcade | Hijack This! Help | IANAG | File Help | Startup DB |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Report Cards: Management
By Marcus Monday, April 21st, 2008 Now is a good time for a thorough, honest evaluation since there has been time for emotions to subside and reflect on the entire season. Let's start with the decision makers, which primarily include Robert Rowell and Chris Mullin. HIGHLIGHTS: *Shed $10 million by trading Jason Richardson and got Brandan Wright and a $10M trade exception in the process *Did not resort to past bad habits and overpay to keep free agents. By not offering lucrative deals to Mickael Pietrus Matt Barnes, by not giving large extensions to Baron Davis and Andris Biedrins, the Warriors are in a good position to make moves this offseason. They have the flexibility to keep Monta and may get bargain prices for Biedrins and Davis because of the market. *Put Nellie in his place by not giving in to his demands, which means another dramatic hold-out is unlikely (better believe Nellie would do it again if he knew he would get what he wanted) *Did not panic at trade deadline and use their $10M exception to take a bad contract. They now have it to use through the draft, which is probably the best time to use it all along. *Wisely decided not to keep the Patrick O'Bryant experiment going *Got good value at No. 18 in the draft in Belinelli LOWLIGHTS: *The Chris Webber fiasco *Putting together a suspect bench for Nellie *Failed to nab Kevin Garnett! I differ a bit from my colleague, Geoff Lepper, who gave Mullin a C+. I think his poor bench construction wasn't that big of a deal. Instead, I think he understood that this year was a giveaway, that even if they made the playoffs, they wouldn't do anything. It looked to me as if he made a strategic decision not to invest too much in the bench and keep the salary cap problems under control. I do agree with Geoff in that the C-Webb signing was a complete joke. GRADE FOR MANAGEMENT: A- What grade would you give Mullin & Co.? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 23, 1:12*am, "Robin Miller" <Not_My@Real_Address.com> wrote:
> Report Cards: Management > > By Marcus > Monday, April 21st, 2008 > > Now is a good time for a thorough, honest evaluation since there has been > time for emotions to subside and reflect on the entire season. > Let's start with the decision makers, which primarily include Robert Rowell > and Chris Mullin. > > HIGHLIGHTS: > *Shed $10 million by trading Jason Richardson and got Brandan Wright and a > $10M trade exception in the process > *Did not resort to past bad habits and overpay to keep free agents. By not > offering lucrative deals to Mickael Pietrus Matt Barnes, by not giving large > extensions to Baron Davis and Andris Biedrins, the Warriors are in a good > position to make moves this offseason. They have the flexibility to keep > Monta and may get bargain prices for Biedrins and Davis because of the > market. > *Put Nellie in his place by not giving in to his demands, which means > another dramatic hold-out is unlikely (better believe Nellie would do it > again if he knew he would get what he wanted) > *Did not panic at trade deadline and use their $10M exception to take a bad > contract. They now have it to use through the draft, which is probably the > best time to use it all along. > *Wisely decided not to keep the Patrick O'Bryant experiment going > *Got good value at No. 18 in the draft in Belinelli > > LOWLIGHTS: > *The Chris Webber fiasco > *Putting together a suspect bench for Nellie > *Failed to nab Kevin Garnett! > > I differ a bit from my colleague, Geoff Lepper, who gave Mullin a C+. I > think his poor bench construction wasn't that big of a deal. Instead, I > think he understood that this year was a giveaway, that even if they made > the playoffs, they wouldn't do anything. It looked to me as if he made a > strategic decision not to invest too much in the bench and keep the salary > cap problems under control. > I do agree with Geoff in that the C-Webb signing was a complete joke. > > GRADE FOR MANAGEMENT: A- > > What grade would you give Mullin & Co.? A+ Simply a fantastic job over the last year and a bit. Weber was a gamble. It didn't pay off, but really, apart from news print, it didn't cost us much either. Bench issues, well I would have expected more from Barnes. The old players brought in probably provided value in the locker room and didn't cost you or me anything. We knew bench production was a year or two away with Bellineli and Wright being rookies, but a high quality core is there. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
David Mills <davemills81@gmail.com> wrote in news:7f05b5fe-f3b4-4030-
[email]b96e-db8adcb95670@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com[/email]: > Weber was a gamble. It didn't pay off, but really, apart from news > print, it didn't cost us much either. I just can't really buy that he was a very good gamble at all. He was pretty spent or he would have been back in Detroit. I wish the Warriors would have expended the effort on getting someone, anyone else. > > Bench issues, well I would have expected more from Barnes. The old > players brought in probably provided value in the locker room and > didn't cost you or me anything. We knew bench production was a year > or two away with Bellineli and Wright being rookies, but a high > quality core is there. > Barnes never looked like he had it together all year. A moment here or there but he was out of it. I really thought Troy Hudson was a good acquisition but worried about his questionable health. That did indeed turn out to be the bugaboo. Having a capable backup PG would have made a huge difference. Croshere was a good pickup but health, again, turned out to be the limiting factor. I think Warriors management did a pretty good job insofar as they didn't damage their financial flexibility for the rapidly approaching future. They just didn't build a very complete/deep team for this year. Credit them for making some seemingly good acquistions that were undone by injury. -- Pat email: remove UN |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:45:56 -0700 (PDT), David Mills
<davemills81@gmail.com> wrote: >> What grade would you give Mullin & Co.? > >A+ I wish you had been responsible for my grades in college. >Simply a fantastic job over the last year and a bit. Avoiding spending money doesn't make you a great GM. The Richardson trade is an A IMO, but not using the exception and not getting a veteran PF for this year drops the offseason to a B. >Weber was a gamble. It was a dumb move that had no chance of working out and didn't. >Bench issues, well I would have expected more from Barnes. Why? He had a lucky year last year. >The old players brought in probably provided value in the locker room and >didn't cost you or me anything. Hudson and Croshere were bad moves that gave us nothing. >We knew bench production was a year or two away with Bellineli and Wright >being rookies, but a high quality core is there. If we knew that, why did so many people predict that Bellinelli would start this year? -- Greg Lentz |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|