Did the 1918 Cubs throw World Series?

[url]http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/mariners/2004354480_seam17.html[/url]

By Sean Deveney

The Sporting News

Cubs fans already know the team's World Series drought has lasted
longer than it should have. But what they might not realize is how
much longer. The odometer has turned in Chicago, where, as readers of
just about any sports section know, the Cubs are in Year 100 of their
World Series chase. Or, as a local T-shirt entrepreneur puts it, the
Cubs are going for their "Century Peat."

It didn't have to be this way. At least, not for 10 more years. That's
because the Cubs should have won the 1918 World Series, and, if they
had, well, who cares about a measly 90 years without a championship?
Alas, in the gambling scandal that never was, the 1918 Cubs just might
have laid down for that year's American League champ, the Boston Red
Sox. In their defense, those Cubs could not have known that, 90 years
later, North Side fans would still be pulling hair out over this team.

Now, it cannot be said for certain that gamblers got to the 1918 Cubs.
But Eddie Cicotte, pitcher and one of the eight White Sox outcasts
from the 1919 World Series, did say in a newly found affidavit he gave
to the 1920 Cook County, Ill., grand jury that the Cubs influenced the
Black Sox. Cicotte said the notion of throwing a World Series first
came up when the White Sox were on a train to New York. The team was
discussing the previous year's World Series, which had been fixed,
according to players. Some members of the White Sox tried to figure
how many players it would take to throw a Series. From that
conversation, Cicotte said, a scandal was born.

That's some heavy-duty history, and, fittingly, the Cicotte affidavit
sits in a room on the third floor of the Chicago Historical Society.
Last December, the museum won an auction for the rights to a group of
documents pertaining to the 1919 White Sox. The museum's curator,
Peter Alter, says the museum will eventually make the documents
available to the public.

In the meantime, Alter gave me a sneak preview. It's fascinating stuff
— private notes, detailed depositions, internal memos, canceled
checks. "It's a lot of material," Alter says. "What you are not going
to find is something definitive that says who was innocent and who was
guilty. People want clear-cut answers — I understand. But there was a
lot going on at the time that clouds the picture."

What stuck with me, though, was Cicotte's testimony. The 1918 Cubs,
inspiration for the 1919 Sox? Two pillars of baseball infamy — the
Cubs' 99-year streak and the Black Sox scandal — both in Chicago, both
solidly linked to what should have been a Cubs championship. The Cubs
were 84-45 that year and serious favorites. Cicotte is not alone in
suggesting they had been paid off. The lost diary of Charles
Comiskey's right-hand man, Harry Grabiner, supposedly indicates that
the 1918 World Series was fixed.

The reporting of baseball columnist Hugh Fullerton — the man who
eventually blew the whistle on baseball's gambling problem — also
suggested that something was afoul in 1918. Fullerton's accounts of
those games repeatedly point out bizarre baserunning mistakes and
defensive flubs.

The box scores support his descriptions. The Cubs were picked off
three times, including twice in the decisive Game 6. That game was
lost, 2-1, on a two-run error by Cubs right fielder Max Flack. Game 4
had been tied, 2-2, in the eighth inning, when Cubs pitcher Shufflin'
Phil Douglas gave up a single, followed by a passed ball, followed by
an errant throw on a bunt attempt that allowed the winning run to
score.

If Cicotte was right, the 2008 Cubs should be heading into Year 90 of
the drought, not Year 100. I asked Darrell Horwitz, creator and
purveyor of the Century Peat T-shirts, how different things might be
if those 1918 Cubs had won. " 'Ninety Peat' would not be quite so
catchy," he said. "But it's still a hell of a long time."

"DrCrawdad" <drcrawdad@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d5cfa492-e43e-40e1-b80c-c963ed555dbd@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
[url]http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/mariners/2004354480_seam17.html[/url]

By Sean Deveney

The Sporting News

The odometer has turned in Chicago, where, as readers of
just about any sports section know, the Cubs are in Year 100 of their
World Series chase.

It didn't have to be this way. At least, not for 10 more years. That's
because the Cubs should have won the 1918 World Series...
Alas, in the gambling scandal that never was, the 1918 Cubs just might have
laid down for that year's American League champ, the Boston Red Sox.

The box scores support his descriptions. The Cubs were picked off
three times, including twice in the decisive Game 6. That game was
lost, 2-1, on a two-run error by Cubs right fielder Max Flack. Game 4
had been tied, 2-2, in the eighth inning, when Cubs pitcher Shufflin'
Phil Douglas gave up a single, followed by a passed ball, followed by
an errant throw on a bunt attempt that allowed the winning run to
score.


It wouldn't surprise me at all if this were going on for a year or two
before the Cubs cheated, because they haven't done anything unique for 100
years, why pave the way in 1908?

On Apr 17, 9:59*pm, DrCrawdad <drcraw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Now, it cannot be said for certain that gamblers got to the 1918 Cubs.

But there is OVERWHELMING evidence for the Black Sox scandal....an
episode which always has, and always will, reign as the single darkest
most humiliating event in the long history of baseball (a history
which began with great teams, like ther Chicago Cubs, many decades
before the Sox even existed).

To this day, the White Sox wear the dismal black-and-white to show
their everlasting disgrace. The fans who wear these colors on Jerseys
and T-shirts also bear this badge of dishonor. The stain wil NEVER
leave their souls for as long as they cling to their miserable
existence.

Now, we have the most recent (and most pathetic) attempt to alleviate
some of the pain: "Hey! Maybe dem Cubs done sumtin too!"

This is just another running example of PackerDaddy's clear obsession
with all things "Cubs". Just look at the topics of his last three
posts...it is bordering on pathetic and pathelogical. But it is not
surprising. The Cubs have something that the White Sox, and their
fans, can never have: The respect, appreciation and love of the People
of Chicago. Winning the Series brought them some notice, but it was
all too fleeting. Now, if you see a White Sox t-shirt on the streets
of Chicago, there is a 50/50 chance that you are looking at a homeless
person who was given the unsold shirt at their local shelter. It is a
sad fact (but a FACT nevertheless) that the White Sox are the poor
little bastard step-child of Chicago sports....and there is nothing
that they can ever, ever, EVER do to change that.

Jeffrey Alsip